Comparison Overview

Wyman Gordon

VS

SpaceX

Wyman Gordon

10825 Telge Rd, Houston, Texas, 77095, US
Last Update: 2025-05-06 (UTC)

Wyman-Gordon is the premier forging company for the global aerospace and energy markets. Providing a specialized service, Wyman-Gordon manufactures forged components from high grade titanium and nickel based alloys. Such components are used for jet engines, including fan disks, compressor disks, turbine disks, and shafts. We also produce titanium and steel forgings for airframes, including wing beams, wing boxes, door and window frames, as well as nacelle and landing gear components. Wyman-Gordon also extrudes steel products for use in power plants and oil and gas industry applications. Our reputation, market position, and operational efficiency are reliant upon our demonstrated ability to continually improve. Major Markets: Aerospace, Power Generation, Oil & Gas Exploration, Medical, Automotive, Locomotive, Food Processing, Nuclear

NAICS: 3364
NAICS Definition: Aerospace Product and Parts Manufacturing
Employees: 1,019
Subsidiaries: 5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

SpaceX

Rocket Road, Hawthorne, California, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-05-06 (UTC)
Between 800 and 849

SpaceX designs, manufactures and launches the world’s most advanced rockets and spacecraft. The company was founded in 2002 by Elon Musk to revolutionize space transportation, with the ultimate goal of making life multiplanetary. SpaceX has gained worldwide attention for a series of historic milestones. It is the only private company ever to return a spacecraft from low-Earth orbit, which it first accomplished in December 2010. The company made history again in May 2012 when its Dragon spacecraft attached to the International Space Station, exchanged cargo payloads, and returned safely to Earth — a technically challenging feat previously accomplished only by governments. Since then Dragon has delivered cargo to and from the space station multiple times, providing regular cargo resupply missions for NASA. For more information, visit www.spacex.com.

NAICS: 3364
NAICS Definition: Aerospace Product and Parts Manufacturing
Employees: 15,141
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wyman-gordon.jpeg
Wyman Gordon
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/spacex.jpeg
SpaceX
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Wyman Gordon
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
SpaceX
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Aviation and Aerospace Component Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Wyman Gordon in 2025.

Incidents vs Aviation and Aerospace Component Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SpaceX in 2025.

Incident History — Wyman Gordon (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Wyman Gordon cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — SpaceX (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SpaceX cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wyman-gordon.jpeg
Wyman Gordon
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/spacex.jpeg
SpaceX
Incidents

Date Detected: 9/2024
Type:Breach
Motivation: Political
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 9/2024
Type:Cyber Attack
Motivation: Attempt at humor
Blog: Blog

FAQ

SpaceX company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Wyman Gordon company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

SpaceX company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Wyman Gordon company has not reported any.

In the current year, SpaceX company and Wyman Gordon company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither SpaceX company nor Wyman Gordon company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

SpaceX company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Wyman Gordon company has not reported such incidents publicly.

SpaceX company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Wyman Gordon company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Wyman Gordon company nor SpaceX company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Wyman Gordon nor SpaceX holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Wyman Gordon company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to SpaceX company.

SpaceX company employs more people globally than Wyman Gordon company, reflecting its scale as a Aviation and Aerospace Component Manufacturing.

Neither Wyman Gordon nor SpaceX holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Wyman Gordon nor SpaceX holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Wyman Gordon nor SpaceX holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Wyman Gordon nor SpaceX holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Wyman Gordon nor SpaceX holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Wyman Gordon nor SpaceX holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Sakai is a Collaboration and Learning Environment. Prior to versions 23.5 and 25.0, EncryptionUtilityServiceImpl initialized an AES256TextEncryptor password (serverSecretKey) using RandomStringUtils with the default java.util.Random. java.util.Random is a non‑cryptographic PRNG and can be predicted from limited state/seed information (e.g., start time window), substantially reducing the effective search space of the generated key. An attacker who can obtain ciphertexts (e.g., exported or at‑rest strings protected by this service) and approximate the PRNG seed can feasibly reconstruct the serverSecretKey and decrypt affected data. SAK-49866 is patched in Sakai 23.5, 25.0, and trunk.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.6
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

pypdf is a free and open-source pure-python PDF library. Prior to version 6.1.3, an attacker who uses this vulnerability can craft a PDF which leads to large memory usage. This requires parsing the content stream of a page using the LZWDecode filter. This has been fixed in pypdf version 6.1.3.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

pypdf is a free and open-source pure-python PDF library. Prior to version 6.1.3, an attacker who uses this vulnerability can craft a PDF which leads to an infinite loop. This requires parsing the content stream of a page which has an inline image using the DCTDecode filter. This has been fixed in pypdf version 6.1.3.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Authlib is a Python library which builds OAuth and OpenID Connect servers. Prior to version 1.6.5, Authlib’s JWE zip=DEF path performs unbounded DEFLATE decompression. A very small ciphertext can expand into tens or hundreds of megabytes on decrypt, allowing an attacker who can supply decryptable tokens to exhaust memory and CPU and cause denial of service. This issue has been patched in version 1.6.5. Workarounds for this issue involve rejecting or stripping zip=DEF for inbound JWEs at the application boundary, forking and add a bounded decompression guard via decompressobj().decompress(data, MAX_SIZE)) and returning an error when output exceeds a safe limit, or enforcing strict maximum token sizes and fail fast on oversized inputs; combine with rate limiting.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

OpenBao is an open source identity-based secrets management system. Prior to version 2.4.2, OpenBao's audit log did not appropriately redact fields when relevant subsystems sent []byte response parameters rather than strings. This includes, but is not limited to sys/raw with use of encoding=base64, all data would be emitted unredacted to the audit log, and Transit, when performing a signing operation with a derived Ed25519 key, would emit public keys to the audit log. This issue has been patched in OpenBao 2.4.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:P/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X