Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

WSSC WaterWSSC Water
VS
Dubai Electricity & Water Authority - DEWADubai Electricity & Water Authority - DEWA
WSSC Water

WSSC Water

14501 Sweitzer Lane, Laurel, MD, US, 20707

Last Update: 31/03/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.wsscwater.com
730/1000Moderate

Established in 1918, WSSC Water is currently among the largest water and wastewater utilities in the nation, with a network of nearly 6,000 miles of drinking water pipeline and over 5,600 miles of sewer pipeline. Our service area spans nearly 1,000 square miles in Princ...

NAICS:22
NAICS Definition:Utilities
Employees:1,422
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Dubai Electricity & Water Authority - DEWA

Dubai Electricity & Water Authority - DEWA

Sheikh Rashid Road, Umm Hureir2, Umm Hureir, Dubai. Makani Number: 31079 91073, Dubai, Dubai, AE, 564

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://www.dewa.gov.ae/en
807/1000Good

Dubai Electricity and Water Authority (DEWA), established on 1 January 1992, stands at the forefront of sustainable energy and water management. With a dedicated workforce of over 11,000 employees, we ensure reliable services across the entire chain of electricity and w...

NAICS:22
NAICS Definition:Utilities
Employees:11,877
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
WSSC Water

WSSC Water

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Dubai Electricity & Water Authority - DEWA

Dubai Electricity & Water Authority - DEWA

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Utilities Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for WSSC Water in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Utilities Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Dubai Electricity & Water Authority - DEWA in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - WSSC Water (X = Date, Y = Severity)

WSSC Water cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Dubai Electricity & Water Authority - DEWA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Dubai Electricity & Water Authority - DEWA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
WSSC Water

WSSC Water

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
WSS2712322
Dubai Electricity & Water Authority - DEWA

Dubai Electricity & Water Authority - DEWA

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between WSSC Water company and Dubai Electricity & Water Authority - DEWA company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between WSSC Water company and Dubai Electricity & Water Authority - DEWA company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between WSSC Water company and Dubai Electricity & Water Authority - DEWA company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between WSSC Water company and Dubai Electricity & Water Authority - DEWA company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between WSSC Water company and Dubai Electricity & Water Authority - DEWA company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between WSSC Water company and Dubai Electricity & Water Authority - DEWA company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between WSSC Water company and Dubai Electricity & Water Authority - DEWA company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between WSSC Water company and Dubai Electricity & Water Authority - DEWA company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between WSSC Water company and Dubai Electricity & Water Authority - DEWA company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between WSSC Water company and Dubai Electricity & Water Authority - DEWA company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between WSSC Water company and Dubai Electricity & Water Authority - DEWA company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between WSSC Water and Dubai Electricity & Water Authority - DEWA, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between WSSC Water and Dubai Electricity & Water Authority - DEWA, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - WSSC Water or Dubai Electricity & Water Authority - DEWA ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - WSSC Water or Dubai Electricity & Water Authority - DEWA ?
Between WSSC Water and Dubai Electricity & Water Authority - DEWA, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between WSSC Water and Dubai Electricity & Water Authority - DEWA, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-48777
SUMMARY

FileBrowser Quantum is a free, self-hosted, web-based file manager. Versions prior to 1.3.2-stable, 1.4.0-beta and 1.4.1-beta are vulnerable to Path Traversal through the publicPatchHandler in backend/http/public.go which joins user-controlled fromPath and toPath body fields with the trusted d.share.Path BEFORE the downstream sanitizer runs. Because filepath.Join collapses .. segments during the join, the sanitizer in resourcePatchHandler never sees the traversal and the move/copy/rename operates on a path outside the shared directory. The same root-cause pattern was patched for the bulk DELETE endpoint as CVE-2026-44542 (GHSA-fwj3-42wh-8673), but the PATCH handler with the identical pattern was not updated. A public share link with AllowModify=true is sufficient to exploit this. Anyone holding such a link can move, copy, or rename arbitrary files within the share owner's source root. This issue has been fixed in versions 1.3.3-stable and 1.4.2-beta.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-16
UPDATED
Date2026-06-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-47750
SUMMARY

stable-diffusion.cpp is a pure C/C++ library for running diffusion model (Stable Diffusion, Flux, Wan, Qwen Image, Z-Image, and more) inference. In versions prior to master-584-0a7ae07, the pickle .ckpt parser in src/model.cpp contained a heap buffer overflow vulnerability in the GLOBAL opcode handler. The issue was caused by missing validation when searching for newline-delimited fields. A crafted .ckpt file without the expected newline could cause the parser to use -1 as a copy length, resulting in immediate heap corruption. The attack requires the victim or application to load a .ckpt file from an untrusted source, such as a downloaded model from a model sharing site. The issue has been resolved in version master-584-0a7ae07. If developers are unable to immediately update their applications they can work around this issue by following these instructions: do not load .ckpt checkpoint files from untrusted sources, and prefer trusted model sources and safer formats such as .safetensors where possible.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-16
UPDATED
Date2026-06-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-47747
SUMMARY

stable-diffusion.cpp is a pure C/C++ library for running diffusion model (Stable Diffusion, Flux, Wan, Qwen Image, Z-Image, and more) inference. In versions prior to master-584-0a7ae07, the pickle .ckpt parser in src/model.cpp contained a heap buffer overflow vulnerability in the BINUNICODE opcode handler. The issue was caused by sign confusion on the opcode length field. A crafted .ckpt file could trigger memcpy with a very large length derived from a negative signed value, causing immediate heap corruption. The issue has been resolved in version master-584-0a7ae07. If developers are unable to immediately update their applications they can work around this issue by only loading .ckpt checkpoint files from trusted sources and preferring trusted model sources and safer formats such as .safetensors where possible.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-16
UPDATED
Date2026-06-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-46448
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Nova before 33.0.2, the server create API does not strip certain hint data. The resulting instance has no Placement allocation.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-16
UPDATED
Date2026-06-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-22313
SUMMARY

The device has a webserver that exposes a REST API authenticated with a token on the management network. By exploiting an OS command injection vulnerability an authenticated attacker can send arbitrary commands to the device that are executed with administrative permissions by the underlying operating system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-16
UPDATED
Date2026-06-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3