Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

WSP in FinlandWSP in Finland
VS
MercerMercer
WSP in Finland

WSP in Finland

Pasilan asema-aukio 1, 13.krs, Helsinki, Southern Finland, FI, 00520

Last Update: 17/01/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.wsp.com/fi-fi
758/1000Fair

Olemme yksi maailman johtavista asiantuntijayrityksistä. Yhdistämällä teknisen suunnittelun, konsultoinnin ja tieteellisen asiantuntijuuden muovaamme yhteisöjä ihmiskunnan parhaaksi. Olemme kasvaneet paikallisista toimijoista maailmanlaajuiseksi yritykseksi. Tänään to...

NAICS:54
NAICS Definition:Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services
Employees:661
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Mercer

Mercer

New York, New York, New York, 10036, US

Last Update: 19/05/2026

View Profile

At Mercer, A Marsh business, we’re helping our clients realize their investment objectives, shape the future of work, and enhance health and retirement outcomes for their people. As a business of Marsh, for 80 years, we’ve been helping our clients, colleagues and comm...

NAICS:54
NAICS Definition:Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services
Employees:22,066
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
WSP in Finland

WSP in Finland

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Mercer

Mercer

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Professional Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for WSP in Finland in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Professional Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mercer in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - WSP in Finland (X = Date, Y = Severity)

WSP in Finland cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Mercer (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mercer cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
WSP in Finland

WSP in Finland

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Mercer

Mercer

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
FIDLPLAMEMER1779194480

FAQ

Between WSP in Finland company and Mercer company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between WSP in Finland company and Mercer company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between WSP in Finland company and Mercer company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between WSP in Finland company and Mercer company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between WSP in Finland company and Mercer company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between WSP in Finland company and Mercer company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between WSP in Finland company and Mercer company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between WSP in Finland company and Mercer company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between WSP in Finland company and Mercer company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between WSP in Finland company and Mercer company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between WSP in Finland company and Mercer company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between WSP in Finland and Mercer, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between WSP in Finland and Mercer, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - WSP in Finland or Mercer ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - WSP in Finland or Mercer ?
Between WSP in Finland and Mercer, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between WSP in Finland and Mercer, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-74250
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Ironic before 38.0.1, the autodetect deploy interface may fail to run cleaning immediately after enrollment with, or changing to, the autodetect deploy interface.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-74247
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. A user with FEATURE_BUILD_SUPPORT enabled and repository write access can exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability within the build API. This allows the user to provide a malicious URL, causing the Quay builder to make requests to internal network addresses. Such an action could lead to the disclosure of sensitive internal information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-74245
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's exported logs feature. An unauthenticated attacker with a valid file ID could download exported action logs without proper authorization. While file IDs are complex, they can be intercepted from plaintext email or webhook callbacks. This vulnerability leads to information disclosure, potentially exposing sensitive data such as usernames, email addresses, IP addresses, and action-specific metadata.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74244
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's Stripe billing webhook handler. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge billing events by sending crafted JSON requests to the `/webhooks/stripe` endpoint without validating the Stripe-Signature header. Successful exploitation can lead to the unauthorized resetting of a namespace's build quota to its maximum and trigger unsolicited billing emails to namespace administrators.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74243
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. When the SECURITY_SCANNER_V4_PSK (pre-shared key) is not set, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send POST requests to the security scanner notification endpoint. This allows the attacker to flood the notification queue and inject path traversal characters into Clair API URL paths. The primary consequence is worker resource exhaustion and blind path manipulation on the configured Clair host, potentially leading to a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9