Comparison Overview
WSP Transport & Infrastructure

WSP Transport & Infrastructure
1600 Boulevard René-Lévesque O, Montreal, H3H 1P9, CA
Last Update: 11/12/2025
What if your work could directly contribute to developing sustainable communities around the world through transport and infrastructure solutions? With us, you can. Our team brings together local insight and global experience to support projects across all phases in b...

MRV
Av. Prof. Mario Werneck, 621, Belo Horizonte, 30.455-610, BR
Last Update: 16/09/2026
Some 45 years ago, we set out with the ambitious goal of providing affordable housing, working to make Brazilian dreams come true. Over the last few years, we have crafted and shaped our story, becoming a brand-leading platform that offers a variety of housing solutions...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

WSP Transport & Infrastructure







MRV






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Civil Engineering Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for WSP Transport & Infrastructure in 2026.
Incidents vs Civil Engineering Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for MRV in 2026.
Incident History - WSP Transport & Infrastructure (X = Date, Y = Severity)
WSP Transport & Infrastructure cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - MRV (X = Date, Y = Severity)
MRV cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

WSP Transport & Infrastructure

MRV
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.