Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

WSP Transport & InfrastructureWSP Transport & Infrastructure
VS
GHDGHD
WSP Transport & Infrastructure

WSP Transport & Infrastructure

1600 Boulevard René-Lévesque O, Montreal, H3H 1P9, CA

Last Update: 11/12/2025

View Profile

What if your work could directly contribute to developing sustainable communities around the world through transport and infrastructure solutions?​ With us, you can. Our team brings together local insight and global experience to support projects across all phases in b...

NAICS:237
NAICS Definition:Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:33
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
GHD

GHD

133 Castlereagh St, Sydney, 2000, AU

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ghd.com
790/1000Fair

We are committed to addressing the world’s biggest challenges in the areas of water, energy and communities. GHD is a global network of multi-disciplinary professionals providing clients with integrated solutions through engineering, environmental, design and construct...

NAICS:237
NAICS Definition:Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction
Employees:16,813
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
WSP Transport & Infrastructure

WSP Transport & Infrastructure

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
GHD

GHD

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Civil Engineering Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for WSP Transport & Infrastructure in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Civil Engineering Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GHD in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - WSP Transport & Infrastructure (X = Date, Y = Severity)

WSP Transport & Infrastructure cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - GHD (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GHD cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
WSP Transport & Infrastructure

WSP Transport & Infrastructure

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
GHD

GHD

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between WSP Transport & Infrastructure company and GHD company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between WSP Transport & Infrastructure company and GHD company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between WSP Transport & Infrastructure company and GHD company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between WSP Transport & Infrastructure company and GHD company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between WSP Transport & Infrastructure company and GHD company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between WSP Transport & Infrastructure company and GHD company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between WSP Transport & Infrastructure company and GHD company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between WSP Transport & Infrastructure company and GHD company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between WSP Transport & Infrastructure company and GHD company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between WSP Transport & Infrastructure company and GHD company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between WSP Transport & Infrastructure company and GHD company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between WSP Transport & Infrastructure and GHD, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between WSP Transport & Infrastructure and GHD, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - WSP Transport & Infrastructure or GHD ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - WSP Transport & Infrastructure or GHD ?
Between WSP Transport & Infrastructure and GHD, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between WSP Transport & Infrastructure and GHD, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA