Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

WSP in the Middle EastWSP in the Middle East
VS
EYEY
WSP in the Middle East

WSP in the Middle East

THE U-BORA TOWER, DUBAI, 27th Floor, Office Suite 2703A & 2703B , Dubai, Dubai, AE, PO Box 7497

Last Update: 31/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.wsp.com/en-ae
776/1000Fair

As one of the world's leading professional services firms, we unite our engineering, advisory and science-based expertise to make a positive impact. We operate in over 50 countries with the collective brilliance of over 73,000 colleagues worldwide. Our ambitious, pass...

NAICS:54
NAICS Definition:Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services
Employees:2,655
Subsidiaries:33
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
EY

EY

6 More London Place, London, GB, SE1 2DA

Last Update: 30/06/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ey.com
757/1000Fair

EY is building a better working world by creating new value for clients, people, society, the planet, while building trust in the capital markets. Enabled by data, AI and advanced technology, EY teams help clients shape the future with confidence and develop answers fo...

NAICS:54
NAICS Definition:Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services
Employees:391,761
Subsidiaries:7
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
6
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
WSP in the Middle East

WSP in the Middle East

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
EY

EY

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Professional Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for WSP in the Middle East in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Professional Services Industry Avg (This Year)

EY has 5.66% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - WSP in the Middle East (X = Date, Y = Severity)

WSP in the Middle East cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - EY (X = Date, Y = Severity)

EY cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
WSP in the Middle East

WSP in the Middle East

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
EY

EY

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
ERNCOM1782793723
🔒 Incident : Breach
ERN0755607110525
🔒 Incident : Breach
ERN2092220102925

FAQ

Between WSP in the Middle East company and EY company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between WSP in the Middle East company and EY company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between WSP in the Middle East company and EY company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between WSP in the Middle East company and EY company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between WSP in the Middle East company and EY company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between WSP in the Middle East company and EY company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between WSP in the Middle East company and EY company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between WSP in the Middle East company and EY company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between WSP in the Middle East company and EY company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between WSP in the Middle East company and EY company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between WSP in the Middle East company and EY company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between WSP in the Middle East and EY, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between WSP in the Middle East and EY, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - WSP in the Middle East or EY ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - WSP in the Middle East or EY ?
Between WSP in the Middle East and EY, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between WSP in the Middle East and EY, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2