Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

WSP en PerúWSP en Perú
VS
Grant Thornton (US)Grant Thornton (US)
WSP en Perú

WSP en Perú

5895 Avenida Paseo de la República, Miraflores, Lima, 15074, PE

Last Update: 08/12/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.wsp.com/es-pe/
754/1000Fair

Somos una de las principales firmas de servicios profesionales del mundo, uniendo nuestra experiencia en ingeniería, asesoría y ciencia para dar forma a las comunidades y avanzar en la humanidad. Desde nuestros inicios locales hasta nuestra presencia global actual, op...

NAICS:541
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:458
Subsidiaries:33
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Grant Thornton (US)

Grant Thornton (US)

171 N. Clark Street, Suite 200, Chicago, IL, US, 60601

Last Update: 05/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://gt-us.co/3LukwpC
767/1000Fair

In the US, Grant Thornton LLP and Grant Thornton Advisors LLC (and their respective subsidiary entities) practice as an alternative practice structure in accordance with the AICPA Code of Professional Conduct and applicable law, regulations and professional standards. G...

NAICS:54
NAICS Definition:Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services
Employees:11,632
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
WSP en Perú

WSP en Perú

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Grant Thornton (US)

Grant Thornton (US)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Professional Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for WSP en Perú in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Professional Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Grant Thornton (US) in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - WSP en Perú (X = Date, Y = Severity)

WSP en Perú cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Grant Thornton (US) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Grant Thornton (US) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
WSP en Perú

WSP en Perú

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Grant Thornton (US)

Grant Thornton (US)

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
GRA519072625

FAQ

Between WSP en Perú company and Grant Thornton (US) company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between WSP en Perú company and Grant Thornton (US) company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between WSP en Perú company and Grant Thornton (US) company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between WSP en Perú company and Grant Thornton (US) company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between WSP en Perú company and Grant Thornton (US) company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between WSP en Perú company and Grant Thornton (US) company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between WSP en Perú company and Grant Thornton (US) company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between WSP en Perú company and Grant Thornton (US) company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between WSP en Perú company and Grant Thornton (US) company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between WSP en Perú company and Grant Thornton (US) company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between WSP en Perú company and Grant Thornton (US) company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between WSP en Perú and Grant Thornton (US), which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between WSP en Perú and Grant Thornton (US), which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - WSP en Perú or Grant Thornton (US) ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - WSP en Perú or Grant Thornton (US) ?
Between WSP en Perú and Grant Thornton (US), which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between WSP en Perú and Grant Thornton (US), which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97626
SUMMARY

Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97208
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96594
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-89182
SUMMARY

With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-86684
SUMMARY

The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA