Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

WSP in BrazilWSP in Brazil
VS
Allied UniversalAllied Universal
WSP in Brazil

WSP in Brazil

Av Ibirapuera 2315, Indianópolis, São Paulo, SP, 04029-200, BR

Last Update: 10/11/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.wsp.com/pt-br/
753/1000Fair

We exist to future-proof our cities and environments. As one of the world's leading professional services consulting firms, we plan, advise, design, manage and engineer long lasting solutions that benefit generations to come. With a Future Ready® mindset, we deliver s...

NAICS:541
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:318
Subsidiaries:33
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Allied Universal

Allied Universal

450 Exchange, Irvine, 92602, US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.aus.com/
784/1000Fair

Allied Universal®, a leading security and facility services company, provides proactive security services and cutting-edge smart technology to deliver evolving, tailored solutions that allow clients to focus on their core business. Our excellence starts with our local l...

NAICS:54
NAICS Definition:Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services
Employees:105,391
Subsidiaries:16
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
WSP in Brazil

WSP in Brazil

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Allied Universal

Allied Universal

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Professional Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for WSP in Brazil in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Professional Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Allied Universal in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - WSP in Brazil (X = Date, Y = Severity)

WSP in Brazil cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Allied Universal (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Allied Universal cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
WSP in Brazil

WSP in Brazil

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Allied Universal

Allied Universal

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
ALL18427423

FAQ

Between WSP in Brazil company and Allied Universal company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between WSP in Brazil company and Allied Universal company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between WSP in Brazil company and Allied Universal company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between WSP in Brazil company and Allied Universal company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between WSP in Brazil company and Allied Universal company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between WSP in Brazil company and Allied Universal company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between WSP in Brazil company and Allied Universal company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between WSP in Brazil company and Allied Universal company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between WSP in Brazil company and Allied Universal company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between WSP in Brazil company and Allied Universal company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between WSP in Brazil company and Allied Universal company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between WSP in Brazil and Allied Universal, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between WSP in Brazil and Allied Universal, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - WSP in Brazil or Allied Universal ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - WSP in Brazil or Allied Universal ?
Between WSP in Brazil and Allied Universal, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between WSP in Brazil and Allied Universal, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-74250
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Ironic before 38.0.1, the autodetect deploy interface may fail to run cleaning immediately after enrollment with, or changing to, the autodetect deploy interface.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-74247
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. A user with FEATURE_BUILD_SUPPORT enabled and repository write access can exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability within the build API. This allows the user to provide a malicious URL, causing the Quay builder to make requests to internal network addresses. Such an action could lead to the disclosure of sensitive internal information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-74245
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's exported logs feature. An unauthenticated attacker with a valid file ID could download exported action logs without proper authorization. While file IDs are complex, they can be intercepted from plaintext email or webhook callbacks. This vulnerability leads to information disclosure, potentially exposing sensitive data such as usernames, email addresses, IP addresses, and action-specific metadata.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74244
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's Stripe billing webhook handler. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge billing events by sending crafted JSON requests to the `/webhooks/stripe` endpoint without validating the Stripe-Signature header. Successful exploitation can lead to the unauthorized resetting of a namespace's build quota to its maximum and trigger unsolicited billing emails to namespace administrators.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74243
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. When the SECURITY_SCANNER_V4_PSK (pre-shared key) is not set, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send POST requests to the security scanner notification endpoint. This allows the attacker to flood the notification queue and inject path traversal characters into Clair API URL paths. The primary consequence is worker resource exhaustion and blind path manipulation on the configured Clair host, potentially leading to a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9