Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

WrigleyWrigley
VS
Kimberly-ClarkKimberly-Clark
Wrigley

Wrigley

1132 W Blackhawk St, Chicago, Illinois, undefined, US

Last Update: 08/12/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.mars.com
774/1000Fair

We’ve moved! Please visit Mars Wrigley Confectionery’s Showcase Page for job opportunities and company updates. *** Page subject to mars.com/legal. Mars, Inc. is not responsible for any content or activity made available via third party sites or services.

NAICS:30
NAICS Definition:Manufacturing
Employees:3,418
Subsidiaries:17
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Kimberly-Clark

Kimberly-Clark

351 Phelps Dr, Irving, TX, US, 75038

Last Update: 22/09/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://linktr.ee/WeAreKC
806/1000Good

At Kimberly-Clark, everything we do begins with care — for people, for communities, and for the planet we share. For more than 150 years, our brands have created essentials that make life better for billions of people every day. Better Care for a Better World is more th...

NAICS:30
NAICS Definition:Manufacturing
Employees:35,203
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Wrigley

Wrigley

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Kimberly-Clark

Kimberly-Clark

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Wrigley in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Kimberly-Clark in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Wrigley (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Wrigley cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Kimberly-Clark (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kimberly-Clark cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Wrigley

Wrigley

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Kimberly-Clark

Kimberly-Clark

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
KIM859072625

FAQ

Between Wrigley company and Kimberly-Clark company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Wrigley company and Kimberly-Clark company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Wrigley company and Kimberly-Clark company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Wrigley company and Kimberly-Clark company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Wrigley company and Kimberly-Clark company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Wrigley company and Kimberly-Clark company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Wrigley company and Kimberly-Clark company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Wrigley company and Kimberly-Clark company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Wrigley company and Kimberly-Clark company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Wrigley company and Kimberly-Clark company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Wrigley company and Kimberly-Clark company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Wrigley and Kimberly-Clark, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Wrigley and Kimberly-Clark, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Wrigley or Kimberly-Clark ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Wrigley or Kimberly-Clark ?
Between Wrigley and Kimberly-Clark, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Wrigley and Kimberly-Clark, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-84411
SUMMARY

The web management service in affected RouterOS versions contains an integer underflow in its HTTP request body handling that is reachable before authentication. This can be leveraged by an unauthenticated network attacker to achieve arbitrary code execution as root, or to cause a denial of service, using a single crafted request.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-02
UPDATED
Date2026-10-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-105051
SUMMARY

Denuvo Anti-Tamper through 2026-03-04 allows bypass of a hypervisor presence check via CPUID interception (SimpleSvm.sys on AMD; hyperkd.sys and hyperhv.dll on Intel).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-02
UPDATED
Date2026-10-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 1.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 1.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
0.5
CVE-2026-105050
SUMMARY

PeaZip before 11.3.0, in a non-default configuration, is vulnerable to OS command injection via a filename in an archive because "quotation character already used in the string" is mishandled.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-02
UPDATED
Date2026-10-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-105049
SUMMARY

Zilliz Attu before 3.0.0 has a Playground feature that does not require authentication for proxying arbitrary HTTP and HTTPS requests to URLs on the public internet.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-02
UPDATED
Date2026-10-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-105048
SUMMARY

The Playground feature of Zilliz Attu before 3.0.0 allows SSRF (proxying of requests to private IP addresses).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-02
UPDATED
Date2026-10-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.0
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2