Comparison Overview
Wright Brothers Construction Company, Inc.

Wright Brothers Construction Company, Inc.
1500 NW Lauderdale Memorial Hwy, Charleston, TN, US, 37310
Last Update: 11/06/2026
Wright Brothers Construction Co., Inc., based in Charleston, Tennessee, was founded in 1961, by two brothers, James and Robert Wright. Wright Brothers performs site preparation, grading, excavating, highway and heavy construction services. We have contracts for bridges ...

Tata Projects
14th - 15th Floor, Cignus, Mumbai, 400087, IN
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Tata Projects is one of the most admired Technology led Engineering, Procurement and Construction (EPC) companies in India. We have expertise in providing sustainable solutions in the execution of large and complex urban and industrial infrastructure projects while also...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Wright Brothers Construction Company, Inc.







Tata Projects






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Wright Brothers Construction Company, Inc. in 2026.
Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Tata Projects in 2026.
Incident History - Wright Brothers Construction Company, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Wright Brothers Construction Company, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Tata Projects (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Tata Projects cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Wright Brothers Construction Company, Inc.

Tata Projects
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Improper access control in Microsoft Edge for Android allows an unauthorized attacker to bypass a security feature over a network.
A security vulnerability has been detected in NousResearch hermes-agent up to 2026.4.30. Affected is the function GatewayStreamConsumer._filter_and_accumulate of the file gateway/stream_consumer.py of the component Streaming Reasoning Tag Filter. The manipulation leads to improper handling of case sensitivity. The attack may be initiated remotely. The attack's complexity is rated as high. The exploitability is told to be difficult. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The project decided to not implement a dedicated fix: "[T]he analysis and the fix are both sound. It just lands below the bar for the maintenance cost of a duplicated scrub path."
- https://gist.github.com/YLChen-007/2229e5505bcbb3e15a7ae8fba4c4be37
- https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/
- https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/issues/27288
- https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/28631#issuecomment-4622188016
- https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-14617
- https://vuldb.com/submit/844654
- https://vuldb.com/vuln/376134
- https://vuldb.com/vuln/376134/cti
Insufficient ui warning of dangerous operations in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.
Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.
Relative path traversal in Microsoft Edge for Android allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information locally.