Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Ottobock Care (Wright & Filippis)Ottobock Care (Wright & Filippis)
VS
Hapvida NotreDame IntermédicaHapvida NotreDame Intermédica
Ottobock Care (Wright & Filippis)

Ottobock Care (Wright & Filippis)

2845 Crooks Road, None, Rochester Hills, Michigan, US, 48309

Last Update: 05/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.FirstToServe.com
720/1000Moderate

Since 1944, Wright & Filippis has built a well-earned reputation as a leader in prosthetics, orthotics, custom mobility products and accessibility solutions. We are over 70 years strong, and now more than ever we are reminded of our ongoing commitment to improve the li...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:258
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica

Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica

Av. Paulista 867, São Paulo, 01311-100, BR

Last Update: 05/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www2.hapvida.com.br
762/1000Fair

Com 80 anos de experiência, a Hapvida é hoje a maior empresa de saúde integrada da América Latina. A companhia, que possui mais de 73 mil colaboradores, atende 16 milhões de beneficiários de saúde e odontologia espalhados pelas cinco regiões do Brasil. Todo o aparato ...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:40,320
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Ottobock Care (Wright & Filippis)

Ottobock Care (Wright & Filippis)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica

Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ottobock Care (Wright & Filippis) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Ottobock Care (Wright & Filippis) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ottobock Care (Wright & Filippis) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Ottobock Care (Wright & Filippis)

Ottobock Care (Wright & Filippis)

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
WRI552072625
Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica

Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Ottobock Care (Wright & Filippis) company and Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Ottobock Care (Wright & Filippis) company and Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Ottobock Care (Wright & Filippis) company and Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Ottobock Care (Wright & Filippis) company and Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Ottobock Care (Wright & Filippis) company and Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Ottobock Care (Wright & Filippis) company and Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Ottobock Care (Wright & Filippis) company and Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Ottobock Care (Wright & Filippis) company and Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Ottobock Care (Wright & Filippis) company and Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Ottobock Care (Wright & Filippis) company and Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Ottobock Care (Wright & Filippis) company and Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Ottobock Care (Wright & Filippis) and Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Ottobock Care (Wright & Filippis) and Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Ottobock Care (Wright & Filippis) or Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Ottobock Care (Wright & Filippis) or Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica ?
Between Ottobock Care (Wright & Filippis) and Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Ottobock Care (Wright & Filippis) and Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-113705
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was determined in a2aproject a2a-rs up to 0.4.3. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file a2a-server/src/error.rs. Executing a manipulation can lead to information exposure through error message. The attack can be executed remotely. This patch is called 713b943af94ab2d521d483b841618b97a2e78a4d. A patch should be applied to remediate this issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 5.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-9825
SUMMARY

IBM Cyber Fraud 1.0.0 through 1.0.2 has a missing secure attribute allowing sensitive cookies to be transmitted over unencrypted connections, potentially enabling an attacker to intercept session data through network-based attacks.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-94402
SUMMARY

IBM Carbon Charts 0.4.0 through 1.27.19 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. The MeterChart component's Title.truncateTitle() function re-inserts a substring of user-supplied label text into the DOM via an unsanitized innerHTML write when the title exceeds the available container width. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the victim's browser session.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-93888
SUMMARY

IBM Sterling Connect Direct for Unix 6.4.0.0 through 6.4.0.6 and 6.3.0.0 through 6.3.0.7 apnotify utility is vulnerable to a code injection due to insufficient validation of user input.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-93744
SUMMARY

IBM i 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, and 7.6 could allow an unathenticated remote attacker to bypass security restrictions due to improper access control. By sending a specially crafted HTTP request to any URL within the Navigator application prior to authentication, a bad actor could exploit this vulnerability to alter server-side session security state.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
Wright-&-filippis vs Hapvida - Cyber Risk Comparison & Security Rating | Rankiteo