Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

WP Site CheckerWP Site Checker
VS
SogetiSogeti
WP Site Checker

WP Site Checker

N/A

Last Update: 06/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://wpsitechecker.com/
751/1000Fair

WP Site Checker is an all-in-one tool for Website testing, built for WP Agencies, Bloggers, Developers, QA Engineers, and Site Owners. A WP Plugin meticulously made by our own developers and QA Testers for managing and maintaining client sites, rather than investing in ...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Sogeti

Sogeti

145-151 Quai du Président Roosevelt,, 92 130 Issy-les-Moulineaux , Paris, Paris - Issy-les-Moulineaux, FR, 92130

Last Update: 30/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.sogeti.com
784/1000Fair

Part of the Capgemini Group, Sogeti makes business value through technology for organizations that need to implement innovation at speed and want a local partner with global scale. With a hands-on culture and close proximity to its clients, Sogeti implements solutions t...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:10,918
Subsidiaries:18
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
WP Site Checker

WP Site Checker

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Sogeti

Sogeti

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for WP Site Checker in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sogeti in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - WP Site Checker (X = Date, Y = Severity)

WP Site Checker cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Sogeti (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sogeti cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
WP Site Checker

WP Site Checker

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Sogeti

Sogeti

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between WP Site Checker company and Sogeti company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between WP Site Checker company and Sogeti company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between WP Site Checker company and Sogeti company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between WP Site Checker company and Sogeti company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between WP Site Checker company and Sogeti company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between WP Site Checker company and Sogeti company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between WP Site Checker company and Sogeti company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between WP Site Checker company and Sogeti company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between WP Site Checker company and Sogeti company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between WP Site Checker company and Sogeti company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between WP Site Checker company and Sogeti company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between WP Site Checker and Sogeti, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between WP Site Checker and Sogeti, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - WP Site Checker or Sogeti ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - WP Site Checker or Sogeti ?
Between WP Site Checker and Sogeti, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between WP Site Checker and Sogeti, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97626
SUMMARY

Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97208
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96594
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-89182
SUMMARY

With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-86684
SUMMARY

The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA