Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » WOW! Internet, TV, & Phone » WOW1782433909

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (WOW1782433909)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-68
Company Score Before Incident594 / 1000
Company Score After Incident526 / 1000
Company LinkView WOW! Internet, TV, & Phone Profile
INCIDENT NUMBERWOW1782433909
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSEDSensitive personal data
INCIDENT DATE24/01/2026
STATUSDismissed (unresolved)

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of WOW! Internet, TV, & Phone's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts WOW! Internet, TV, & Phone Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the WOW! Internet, TV, & Phone breach identified under incident ID WOW1782433909.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of WOW! Internet, TV, & Phone's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/wow-internet-tv-&-phone, the number of followers: 24392, the industry type: Telecommunications and the number of employees: 2327 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 594 and after the incident was 526 with a difference of -68 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on WOW! Internet, TV, & Phone and their customers.

Denver-based fiber internet provider recently reported "Denver Fiber Internet Provider Data Breach Lawsuit Dismissed", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.

A customer of a Denver-based fiber internet provider voluntarily dismissed a proposed class action lawsuit alleging the company failed to safeguard customers' sensitive personal data during a cyberattack and delayed notifying affected individuals for five months.

The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing Sensitive personal data.

In response, and stakeholders are being briefed through Delayed notification (5 months).

The case underscores how Dismissed (unresolved).

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating inadequate security measures led to the exposure of customer information and Trusted Relationship (T1199) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating cyberattack targeting a fiber internet provider. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Adversary-in-the-Middle (T1557) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating sensitive personal data compromised due to inadequate security measures and Brute Force (T1110) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating inadequate security measures may have allowed unauthorized access. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating sensitive personal data was compromised during the cyberattack. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating data breach involving sensitive personal data and Transfer Data to Cloud Account (T1537) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating no details on data exfiltration methods disclosed. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating potential harm exacerbated by delayed notification and Data Manipulation: Transmitted Data Manipulation (T1565.002) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating inadequate security measures may have allowed data tampering. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating cyberattack exploiting inadequate security measures and Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (T1562.001) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating inadequate security measures may have allowed defense bypass. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Sources & References