Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Worldwide Facilities, LLC an Amwins CompanyWorldwide Facilities, LLC an Amwins Company
VS
Marsh RiskMarsh Risk
Worldwide Facilities, LLC an Amwins Company

Worldwide Facilities, LLC an Amwins Company

US

Last Update: 29/03/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.wwfi.com
808/1000Good

Established in 1970, Worldwide Facilities is a national wholesale insurance broker, managing general agent and program underwriter. We offer property, casualty, professional and personal lines products as well as specialty programs to insurance agents and brokers nation...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:135
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Marsh Risk

Marsh Risk

1166 Avenue of the Americas, New York, New York, US, 10036

Last Update: 08/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.marsh.com
796/1000Fair

We help our clients and colleagues grow — and our communities thrive — by protecting and promoting possibility. We seek better ways to manage risk and define more effective paths to the right outcome. We go beyond risk to rewards for our clients, our company, our collea...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:26,578
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Worldwide Facilities, LLC an Amwins Company

Worldwide Facilities, LLC an Amwins Company

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Marsh Risk

Marsh Risk

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Worldwide Facilities, LLC an Amwins Company in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Marsh Risk in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Worldwide Facilities, LLC an Amwins Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Worldwide Facilities, LLC an Amwins Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Marsh Risk (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Marsh Risk cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Worldwide Facilities, LLC an Amwins Company

Worldwide Facilities, LLC an Amwins Company

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
WOR927072725
Marsh Risk

Marsh Risk

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Worldwide Facilities, LLC an Amwins Company company and Marsh Risk company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Worldwide Facilities, LLC an Amwins Company company and Marsh Risk company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Worldwide Facilities, LLC an Amwins Company company and Marsh Risk company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Worldwide Facilities, LLC an Amwins Company company and Marsh Risk company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Worldwide Facilities, LLC an Amwins Company company and Marsh Risk company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Worldwide Facilities, LLC an Amwins Company company and Marsh Risk company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Worldwide Facilities, LLC an Amwins Company company and Marsh Risk company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Worldwide Facilities, LLC an Amwins Company company and Marsh Risk company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Worldwide Facilities, LLC an Amwins Company company and Marsh Risk company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Worldwide Facilities, LLC an Amwins Company company and Marsh Risk company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Worldwide Facilities, LLC an Amwins Company company and Marsh Risk company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Worldwide Facilities, LLC an Amwins Company and Marsh Risk, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Worldwide Facilities, LLC an Amwins Company and Marsh Risk, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Worldwide Facilities, LLC an Amwins Company or Marsh Risk ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Worldwide Facilities, LLC an Amwins Company or Marsh Risk ?
Between Worldwide Facilities, LLC an Amwins Company and Marsh Risk, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Worldwide Facilities, LLC an Amwins Company and Marsh Risk, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-16174
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-16172
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-87958
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-86093
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-86087
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8