Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

World Vision Switzerland and LiechtensteinWorld Vision Switzerland and Liechtenstein
VS
International Rescue CommitteeInternational Rescue Committee
World Vision Switzerland and Liechtenstein

World Vision Switzerland and Liechtenstein

World Vision Schweiz, Kriesbachstrasse 30, Dübendorf, ZH, CH, 8600

Last Update: 26/12/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.worldvision.ch
761/1000Fair

World Vision, is the largest child focused development NGOs with 44,000 staff, operating in over 90 countries. We belief that some of the most effective ways to overcome children's poverty and to create wealth is through sustainable market based approaches, hence we inc...

NAICS:8135
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:34
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
International Rescue Committee

International Rescue Committee

122 E 42st , New York, NY, US, 10168

Last Update: 30/03/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://www.rescue.org/
805/1000Good

The International Rescue Committee responds to the world’s worst humanitarian crises and help people to survive, recover, and gain control of their future. Founded in 1933 at the request of Albert Einstein, the IRC offers lifesaving care and life-changing assistance t...

NAICS:8135
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:13,311
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
World Vision Switzerland and Liechtenstein

World Vision Switzerland and Liechtenstein

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
International Rescue Committee

International Rescue Committee

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Non-profit Organizations Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for World Vision Switzerland and Liechtenstein in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Non-profit Organizations Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for International Rescue Committee in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - World Vision Switzerland and Liechtenstein (X = Date, Y = Severity)

World Vision Switzerland and Liechtenstein cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - International Rescue Committee (X = Date, Y = Severity)

International Rescue Committee cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
World Vision Switzerland and Liechtenstein

World Vision Switzerland and Liechtenstein

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
International Rescue Committee

International Rescue Committee

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between World Vision Switzerland and Liechtenstein company and International Rescue Committee company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between World Vision Switzerland and Liechtenstein company and International Rescue Committee company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between World Vision Switzerland and Liechtenstein company and International Rescue Committee company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between World Vision Switzerland and Liechtenstein company and International Rescue Committee company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between World Vision Switzerland and Liechtenstein company and International Rescue Committee company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between World Vision Switzerland and Liechtenstein company and International Rescue Committee company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between World Vision Switzerland and Liechtenstein company and International Rescue Committee company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between World Vision Switzerland and Liechtenstein company and International Rescue Committee company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between World Vision Switzerland and Liechtenstein company and International Rescue Committee company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between World Vision Switzerland and Liechtenstein company and International Rescue Committee company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between World Vision Switzerland and Liechtenstein company and International Rescue Committee company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between World Vision Switzerland and Liechtenstein and International Rescue Committee, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between World Vision Switzerland and Liechtenstein and International Rescue Committee, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - World Vision Switzerland and Liechtenstein or International Rescue Committee ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - World Vision Switzerland and Liechtenstein or International Rescue Committee ?
Between World Vision Switzerland and Liechtenstein and International Rescue Committee, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between World Vision Switzerland and Liechtenstein and International Rescue Committee, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1