Comparison Overview

Workplace Options

VS

Lovaas Institute

Workplace Options

2912 Highwoods Boulevard, Raleigh, NC, 27604, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22

Founded in 1982, Workplace Options is the largest independent provider of holistic wellbeing solutions. Through our customized programs, and comprehensive global network of credentialed providers and professionals, we support individuals to become healthier, happier and more productive both personally and professionally. Trusted by 50% of Fortune 500 companies, we deliver high-quality care digitally and in-person to over 88 million individuals across 127,000 organizations in more than 200 countries and territories. Important notice from the Workplace Options recruitment team Our job openings are listed at https://www.linkedin.com/company/workplace-options/jobs/. As a candidate, please be mindful to protect yourselves and your personal information from illegitimate offers. We will only contact you from an @https://www.linkedin.com/redir/suspicious-page?url=workplaceoptions%2ecom email address throughout the recruitment process. Some signs that may indicate the offer is not real: - You are asked to purchase your own equipment. - The company requires payment from you. - The domain site doesn’t match the employer site. - A recruiter asks for any personal information aside from your basic contact information, such as your social security number or bank account number. Our recruitment team is here to support you in your job search and is happy to answer any questions you may have. You can reach us at careers@https://www.linkedin.com/redir/suspicious-page?url=workplaceoptions%2ecom.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 1,596
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Lovaas Institute

2925 Dean Parkway, Suite 300, Minneapolis, MN, 55416, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Innovation, Effectiveness, Accountability. The Lovaas Institute & Lovaas Institute Midwest are committed to providing the highest quality treatment available to children diagnosed with autism or a related disorder. We approach this one child at a time by individualizing each child’s program to best meet his or her needs. From the groundbreaking research of our founder, O. Ivar Lovaas, to the innovations of today, our clinicians are the leaders in the field of Early Intensive Behavioral Intervention. We provide direct behavior analysis services to local families and schools, and long distance behavioral consultation to families, schools, and community organizations.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 153
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/workplace-options.jpeg
Workplace Options
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lovaas-institute-midwest.jpeg
Lovaas Institute
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Workplace Options
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Lovaas Institute
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Workplace Options in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lovaas Institute in 2026.

Incident History — Workplace Options (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Workplace Options cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Lovaas Institute (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lovaas Institute cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/workplace-options.jpeg
Workplace Options
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lovaas-institute-midwest.jpeg
Lovaas Institute
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Workplace Options company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Lovaas Institute company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Lovaas Institute company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Workplace Options company.

In the current year, Lovaas Institute company and Workplace Options company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Lovaas Institute company nor Workplace Options company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Lovaas Institute company nor Workplace Options company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Lovaas Institute company nor Workplace Options company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Workplace Options company nor Lovaas Institute company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Workplace Options nor Lovaas Institute holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Workplace Options company nor Lovaas Institute company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Workplace Options company employs more people globally than Lovaas Institute company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Workplace Options nor Lovaas Institute holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Workplace Options nor Lovaas Institute holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Workplace Options nor Lovaas Institute holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Workplace Options nor Lovaas Institute holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Workplace Options nor Lovaas Institute holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Workplace Options nor Lovaas Institute holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N