Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Working From Home services from Fresh MangoWorking From Home services from Fresh Mango
VS
AvanadeAvanade
Working From Home services from Fresh Mango

Working From Home services from Fresh Mango

6 Brewery Close, Melmerby, Ripon, HG4 5NL, GB

Last Update: 05/12/2025

View Profile

Do you need an effective working from home solution for your business? We have advice, equipment, and software available to make your working from home life less stressful. We have laptops available to help you while working from home. We have networking equipment inc...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:19
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Avanade

Avanade

1191 2nd Ave, Seattle, Washington, US, 98101

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile

Avanade is the world’s leading expert on Microsoft. Trusted by over 7,000 clients worldwide, we deliver AI-driven solutions that unlock the full potential of people and technology, optimize operations, foster innovation and drive growth. As Microsoft’s Global SI Partne...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:17,197
Subsidiaries:16
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Working From Home services from Fresh Mango

Working From Home services from Fresh Mango

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Avanade

Avanade

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Working From Home services from Fresh Mango in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Avanade in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Working From Home services from Fresh Mango (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Working From Home services from Fresh Mango cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Avanade (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Avanade cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Working From Home services from Fresh Mango

Working From Home services from Fresh Mango

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Avanade

Avanade

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Working From Home services from Fresh Mango company and Avanade company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Working From Home services from Fresh Mango company and Avanade company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Working From Home services from Fresh Mango company and Avanade company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Working From Home services from Fresh Mango company and Avanade company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Working From Home services from Fresh Mango company and Avanade company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Working From Home services from Fresh Mango company and Avanade company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Working From Home services from Fresh Mango company and Avanade company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Working From Home services from Fresh Mango company and Avanade company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Working From Home services from Fresh Mango company and Avanade company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Working From Home services from Fresh Mango company and Avanade company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Working From Home services from Fresh Mango company and Avanade company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Working From Home services from Fresh Mango and Avanade, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Working From Home services from Fresh Mango and Avanade, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Working From Home services from Fresh Mango or Avanade ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Working From Home services from Fresh Mango or Avanade ?
Between Working From Home services from Fresh Mango and Avanade, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Working From Home services from Fresh Mango and Avanade, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2