Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Working From Home services from Fresh MangoWorking From Home services from Fresh Mango
VS
Amazon Web Services (AWS)Amazon Web Services (AWS)
Working From Home services from Fresh Mango

Working From Home services from Fresh Mango

6 Brewery Close, Melmerby, Ripon, HG4 5NL, GB

Last Update: 05/12/2025

View Profile

Do you need an effective working from home solution for your business? We have advice, equipment, and software available to make your working from home life less stressful. We have laptops available to help you while working from home. We have networking equipment inc...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:19
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

410 Terry Ave N, Seattle, 98019, US

Last Update: 03/10/2026

View Profile
Between 0 and 549
http://aws.amazon.com
502/1000Critical

Launched in 2006, Amazon Web Services (AWS) began exposing key infrastructure services to businesses in the form of web services -- now widely known as cloud computing. The ultimate benefit of cloud computing, and AWS, is the ability to leverage a new business model and...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:148,035
Subsidiaries:95
12-month incidents
28
Known data breaches
7
Attack type number
5

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Working From Home services from Fresh Mango

Working From Home services from Fresh Mango

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Working From Home services from Fresh Mango in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

Amazon Web Services (AWS) has 2645.1% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Working From Home services from Fresh Mango (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Working From Home services from Fresh Mango cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Amazon Web Services (AWS) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Amazon Web Services (AWS) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Working From Home services from Fresh Mango

Working From Home services from Fresh Mango

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
AMA1791008649
🔒 Incident : Breach
GITGOOAMA1790591146
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
AMA1789374268

FAQ

Between Working From Home services from Fresh Mango company and Amazon Web Services (AWS) company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Working From Home services from Fresh Mango company and Amazon Web Services (AWS) company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Working From Home services from Fresh Mango company and Amazon Web Services (AWS) company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Working From Home services from Fresh Mango company and Amazon Web Services (AWS) company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Working From Home services from Fresh Mango company and Amazon Web Services (AWS) company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Working From Home services from Fresh Mango company and Amazon Web Services (AWS) company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Working From Home services from Fresh Mango company and Amazon Web Services (AWS) company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Working From Home services from Fresh Mango company and Amazon Web Services (AWS) company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Working From Home services from Fresh Mango company and Amazon Web Services (AWS) company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Working From Home services from Fresh Mango company and Amazon Web Services (AWS) company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Working From Home services from Fresh Mango company and Amazon Web Services (AWS) company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Working From Home services from Fresh Mango and Amazon Web Services (AWS), which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Working From Home services from Fresh Mango and Amazon Web Services (AWS), which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Working From Home services from Fresh Mango or Amazon Web Services (AWS) ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Working From Home services from Fresh Mango or Amazon Web Services (AWS) ?
Between Working From Home services from Fresh Mango and Amazon Web Services (AWS), which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Working From Home services from Fresh Mango and Amazon Web Services (AWS), which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97626
SUMMARY

Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97208
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96594
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-89182
SUMMARY

With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-86684
SUMMARY

The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA