Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Workday K.K. ワークデイ株式会社Workday K.K. ワークデイ株式会社
VS
PhonePePhonePe
Workday K.K. ワークデイ株式会社

Workday K.K. ワークデイ株式会社

N/A

Last Update: 10/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.workday.com/jp
752/1000Fair

「未来を創る企業は人事を、ビジネスの真ん中に置く。」 Workdayは、人事戦略と経営戦略を連携させ、経営に貢献する強い人事部門の実現を支援します。AIを組み込んだ人事・財務を統合するクラウドプラットフォームを通じて、HRモダナイゼーションを推進し、人事を経営の推進力へと進化させます。 ビジネス環境が急速に変化する今、求められるのは分断された制度やシステムではなく、リアルタイムなデータに基づく意思決定です。 Workdayは、次のような価値を提供しています。 ・人財管理/財務管理を統合 ・データをリアルタイムで可視化し、迅速な意...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:16
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
PhonePe

PhonePe

Green Glen Layout Road, Bengaluru East, 560103, IN

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://www.phonepe.com
801/1000Good

PhonePe Group is India’s leading fintech company, proudly recognized as India’s #1 Trusted Digital Payments* Brand for three consecutive years. Our flagship product, the PhonePe app was launched in August 2016, has rapidly become the preferred consumer payments app in I...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:18,344
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Workday K.K. ワークデイ株式会社

Workday K.K. ワークデイ株式会社

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
PhonePe

PhonePe

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Workday K.K. ワークデイ株式会社 in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PhonePe in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Workday K.K. ワークデイ株式会社 (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Workday K.K. ワークデイ株式会社 cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - PhonePe (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PhonePe cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Workday K.K. ワークデイ株式会社

Workday K.K. ワークデイ株式会社

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
PhonePe

PhonePe

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Workday K.K. ワークデイ株式会社 company and PhonePe company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Workday K.K. ワークデイ株式会社 company and PhonePe company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Workday K.K. ワークデイ株式会社 company and PhonePe company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Workday K.K. ワークデイ株式会社 company and PhonePe company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Workday K.K. ワークデイ株式会社 company and PhonePe company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Workday K.K. ワークデイ株式会社 company and PhonePe company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Workday K.K. ワークデイ株式会社 company and PhonePe company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Workday K.K. ワークデイ株式会社 company and PhonePe company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Workday K.K. ワークデイ株式会社 company and PhonePe company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Workday K.K. ワークデイ株式会社 company and PhonePe company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Workday K.K. ワークデイ株式会社 company and PhonePe company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Workday K.K. ワークデイ株式会社 and PhonePe, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Workday K.K. ワークデイ株式会社 and PhonePe, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Workday K.K. ワークデイ株式会社 or PhonePe ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Workday K.K. ワークデイ株式会社 or PhonePe ?
Between Workday K.K. ワークデイ株式会社 and PhonePe, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Workday K.K. ワークデイ株式会社 and PhonePe, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-81934
SUMMARY

Redis contains a use-after-free vulnerability in the 'tlsProcessPendingData()' function, which handles the TLS pending-data list if Redis is configured with TLS support. A remote, unauthenticated attacker may be able to execute arbitrary commands with the privileges of the Redis server. Fixed in Redis 8.2.9, 8.4.6, 8.6.6, 8.8.2, and 8.10.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-27
UPDATED
Date2026-08-27
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-81931
SUMMARY

Unrestricted Upload of File with Dangerous Type in the product photo upload in Roskus Prospero Flow CRM before 5.16.0 allows an authenticated user holding the create product permission (routine Seller role) to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the application origin. The photo validation rule classifies the file only by its content (magic bytes) and rejects only a fixed list of PHP extensions, while ProductSaveController::save() names the stored file using the client-supplied extension and copies it into the public web root. A file that begins with an image header and carries an HTML extension passes validation, is stored under public/asset/upload/product/, and is served with a text/html content type, turning the upload into first-party stored script execution.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-27
UPDATED
Date2026-08-27
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 4.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-81893
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in gdk-pixbuf. When loading a specially crafted JPEG image containing chunked ICC profile markers, an error during ICC profile parsing can leave stale size metadata after the profile buffer is freed. A subsequent allocation in the same decode can cause an out-of-bounds write, potentially crashing the application. To exploit this flaw, an application using gdk-pixbuf must process the malicious JPEG image. Affected version >= 2.26.4

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-27
UPDATED
Date2026-08-27
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1
CVE-2026-81838
SUMMARY

A relative path traversal issue in the zip extraction functionality in AWS diagram-as-code (awsdac) in versions 0.10 through 0.23 can allow a third party to write arbitrary files to the local filesystem via crafted zip entry names containing path traversal sequences. This could allow the third party to perform inappropriate actions in the diagram bundle. To remediate this issue, users should upgrade to the version 0.24 or later.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-27
UPDATED
Date2026-08-27
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:N/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-81834
SUMMARY

A weakness has been identified in RooCodeInc Roo-Code up to 3.51.1. Affected by this issue is the function ExecaTerminalProcess of the component README File Handler. Executing a manipulation can lead to code injection. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be used for attacks. Multiple isses were reported to the vendor beforehand. They explain, that "they all apply to Roo Code, a project we no longer support - the repository was archived a while ago, and we don't encourage anyone to use it." This vulnerability only affects products that are no longer supported by the maintainer.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-27
UPDATED
Date2026-08-27
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8