Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Workday K.K. ワークデイ株式会社Workday K.K. ワークデイ株式会社
VS
JD.COMJD.COM
Workday K.K. ワークデイ株式会社

Workday K.K. ワークデイ株式会社

N/A

Last Update: 10/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.workday.com/jp
752/1000Fair

「未来を創る企業は人事を、ビジネスの真ん中に置く。」 Workdayは、人事戦略と経営戦略を連携させ、経営に貢献する強い人事部門の実現を支援します。AIを組み込んだ人事・財務を統合するクラウドプラットフォームを通じて、HRモダナイゼーションを推進し、人事を経営の推進力へと進化させます。 ビジネス環境が急速に変化する今、求められるのは分断された制度やシステムではなく、リアルタイムなデータに基づく意思決定です。 Workdayは、次のような価値を提供しています。 ・人財管理/財務管理を統合 ・データをリアルタイムで可視化し、迅速な意...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:16
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
JD.COM

JD.COM

JD Building, No. 18 Kechuang 11 Street, BDA, Beijing, 101111, CN

Last Update: 01/08/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://corporate.jd.com/
809/1000Good

JD.com, also known as JINGDONG, is a leading e-commerce company transferring to be a technology and service enterprise with supply chain at its core. JD.com’s business has expanded across retail, technology, logistics, health, property development, industrials, and inte...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:38,695
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Workday K.K. ワークデイ株式会社

Workday K.K. ワークデイ株式会社

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
JD.COM

JD.COM

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Workday K.K. ワークデイ株式会社 in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for JD.COM in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Workday K.K. ワークデイ株式会社 (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Workday K.K. ワークデイ株式会社 cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - JD.COM (X = Date, Y = Severity)

JD.COM cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Workday K.K. ワークデイ株式会社

Workday K.K. ワークデイ株式会社

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
JD.COM

JD.COM

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Workday K.K. ワークデイ株式会社 company and JD.COM company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Workday K.K. ワークデイ株式会社 company and JD.COM company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Workday K.K. ワークデイ株式会社 company and JD.COM company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Workday K.K. ワークデイ株式会社 company and JD.COM company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Workday K.K. ワークデイ株式会社 company and JD.COM company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Workday K.K. ワークデイ株式会社 company and JD.COM company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Workday K.K. ワークデイ株式会社 company and JD.COM company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Workday K.K. ワークデイ株式会社 company and JD.COM company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Workday K.K. ワークデイ株式会社 company and JD.COM company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Workday K.K. ワークデイ株式会社 company and JD.COM company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Workday K.K. ワークデイ株式会社 company and JD.COM company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Workday K.K. ワークデイ株式会社 and JD.COM, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Workday K.K. ワークデイ株式会社 and JD.COM, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Workday K.K. ワークデイ株式会社 or JD.COM ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Workday K.K. ワークデイ株式会社 or JD.COM ?
Between Workday K.K. ワークデイ株式会社 and JD.COM, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Workday K.K. ワークデイ株式会社 and JD.COM, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-19961
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was detected in Edimax EW-7478APC 1.04. Affected is the function formWlSiteSurvey of the file /goform/formWlSiteSurvey. Performing a manipulation of the argument selSSID results in buffer overflow. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-16
UPDATED
Date2026-08-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.9)
CVSS2
Base Score: 9.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.1
CVE-2026-19960
SUMMARY

A security vulnerability has been detected in Edimax EW-7478APC 1.04. This impacts the function formWlbasic of the file /goform/formWlbasic. Such manipulation of the argument rootAPmac leads to command injection. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-16
UPDATED
Date2026-08-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:L/SI:L/SA:L/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.7
EXPLOITABILITY
3.1
CVE-2026-19959
SUMMARY

A weakness has been identified in Edimax EW-7478APC 1.04. This affects the function formWanTcpipSetup of the file /goform/formWanTcpipSetup. This manipulation of the argument pppUserName causes stack-based buffer overflow. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be used for attacks. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-16
UPDATED
Date2026-08-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.9)
CVSS2
Base Score: 9.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.1
CVE-2026-19958
SUMMARY

A security flaw has been discovered in iatsiuk pptr-mcp up to 0.2.7. The impacted element is the function executeCode of the file src/vm-executor.ts of the component execute Tool. The manipulation results in code injection. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-16
UPDATED
Date2026-08-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-19957
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was identified in graphlit graphlit-mcp-server 1.0.1. This affects the function fetch of the file src/tools.ts of the component ssrf-test Endpoint. Such manipulation of the argument url leads to server-side request forgery. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-16
UPDATED
Date2026-08-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8