Comparison Overview

Woolworths

VS

Starbucks

Woolworths

93 Longmarket Street, Cape Town, 8000, ZA
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 800 and 849

Woolworths offers a unique blend of food, fashion, beauty and homeware. Since 1931, we’ve found ways to do better, think bigger, inspire more, care more. As we continue to innovate and evolve, our commitment to quality will never change. Woolies Exceptional Quality™ is the driving force of every decision we make, product we sell and customer we serve. Our values inform what we stand for and underpin everything we do. And our duty to leave the world and our community in a better place than we found it means that sustainability, transparency and ethical practices sit at the heart of our business. Join us and our creative, innovative, passionate and dedicated 34 000 strong staff on our journey to be a leading retailer in the southern hemisphere.

NAICS: 43
NAICS Definition: Retail Trade
Employees: 35,716
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Starbucks

2401 Utah Ave S, Seattle, 98134, US
Last Update: 2026-01-18

At Starbucks, we like to say that we are not in the coffee business serving people, but in the people business serving coffee. Here, our employees - who we call partners – are the heart of the Starbucks experience, and being a partner means aspiring to become part of something bigger: inspiring positive change in the world and growing in your career and in your community. ​ It’s an opportunity to be your personal best. ​ Starbucks is an equal opportunity employer of all qualified individuals, including minorities, veterans and individuals with disabilities.​​ In everything we do, we are dedicated to our mission: To be the premier purveyor of the finest coffee in the world, inspiring and nurturing the human spirit — one person, one cup and one neighborhood at a time. Join us. Inspire with every cup. Explore opportunities, benefits and more at careers.starbucks.com

NAICS: 43
NAICS Definition: Retail Trade
Employees: 183,457
Subsidiaries: 6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/woolworths.jpeg
Woolworths
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/starbucks.jpeg
Starbucks
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Woolworths
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Starbucks
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Woolworths in 2026.

Incidents vs Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Starbucks in 2026.

Incident History — Woolworths (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Woolworths cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Starbucks (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Starbucks cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/woolworths.jpeg
Woolworths
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/starbucks.jpeg
Starbucks
Incidents

Date Detected: 09/2022
Type:Breach
Motivation: Financial
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Woolworths company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Starbucks company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Starbucks company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Woolworths company has not reported any.

In the current year, Starbucks company and Woolworths company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Starbucks company nor Woolworths company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Starbucks company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Woolworths company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Starbucks company nor Woolworths company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Woolworths company nor Starbucks company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Woolworths nor Starbucks holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Starbucks company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Woolworths company.

Starbucks company employs more people globally than Woolworths company, reflecting its scale as a Retail.

Neither Woolworths nor Starbucks holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Woolworths nor Starbucks holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Woolworths nor Starbucks holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Woolworths nor Starbucks holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Woolworths nor Starbucks holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Woolworths nor Starbucks holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.