Comparison Overview
Woolworths Supermarkets

Woolworths Supermarkets
1 Woolworths Way, Bella Vista, 2153, AU
Last Update: 01/04/2026
There are over 128,000 of us across Australia. We’re in the biggest cities and the tiniest towns. We’re meal creators and digital developers. Number crunchers and fresh food deliverers. Yes, we all have many skills and wear many hats. But we’re all the same team, becaus...

Kroger
1014 Vine Street, Cincinnati, 45202, US
Last Update: 05/06/2026
At Kroger, we believe no matter who you are or how you like to shop, everyone deserves affordable, easy-to-enjoy, fresh food. This idea is embodied in our simple tagline—Fresh for Everyone™. Kroger ranks as one of the world’s largest retailers. We are nearly half a m...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Woolworths Supermarkets







Kroger






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Woolworths Supermarkets in 2026.
Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Kroger in 2026.
Incident History - Woolworths Supermarkets (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Woolworths Supermarkets cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Kroger (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Kroger cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Woolworths Supermarkets

Kroger
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.