Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Woolworths New ZealandWoolworths New Zealand
VS
E.LeclercE.Leclerc
Woolworths New Zealand

Woolworths New Zealand

N/A

Last Update: 17/02/2026

View Profile
760/1000Fair

We are Aotearoa’s leading supermarket brand, across 185 stores we serve about 3 million customers every week. It’s a big job, but we love what we do - giving customers the very best in choice, value and convenience, while keeping our social and environmental responsibil...

NAICS:44511
NAICS Definition:Supermarkets and Other Grocery (except Convenience) Stores
Employees:913
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
E.Leclerc

E.Leclerc

26 quai Marcel Boyer, Ivry sur Seine, 94200 , FR

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.e.leclerc
791/1000Fair

Depuis plus de 70 ans, E.Leclerc poursuit un objectif : démocratiser la consommation, c'est l'expression de son utilité sociale. Cet engagement au service du plus grand nombre doit permettre à chacun d'accéder aux produits et services dont il a besoin ou envie, au quoti...

NAICS:44511
NAICS Definition:Supermarkets and Other Grocery (except Convenience) Stores
Employees:40,700
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Woolworths New Zealand

Woolworths New Zealand

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
E.Leclerc

E.Leclerc

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Groceries Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Woolworths New Zealand in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Groceries Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for E.Leclerc in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Woolworths New Zealand (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Woolworths New Zealand cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - E.Leclerc (X = Date, Y = Severity)

E.Leclerc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Woolworths New Zealand

Woolworths New Zealand

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
E.Leclerc

E.Leclerc

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Woolworths New Zealand company and E.Leclerc company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Woolworths New Zealand company and E.Leclerc company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Woolworths New Zealand company and E.Leclerc company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Woolworths New Zealand company and E.Leclerc company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Woolworths New Zealand company and E.Leclerc company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Woolworths New Zealand company and E.Leclerc company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Woolworths New Zealand company and E.Leclerc company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Woolworths New Zealand company and E.Leclerc company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Woolworths New Zealand company and E.Leclerc company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Woolworths New Zealand company and E.Leclerc company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Woolworths New Zealand company and E.Leclerc company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Woolworths New Zealand and E.Leclerc, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Woolworths New Zealand and E.Leclerc, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Woolworths New Zealand or E.Leclerc ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Woolworths New Zealand or E.Leclerc ?
Between Woolworths New Zealand and E.Leclerc, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Woolworths New Zealand and E.Leclerc, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2