Comparison Overview

Woodling, Krost and Rust

VS

LegalSight

Woodling, Krost and Rust

44094, US
Last Update: 2025-11-29
Between 750 and 799

Woodling, Krost, and Rust (WKR) is an international patent and intellectual property law firm based in the Cleveland, Ohio area since 1936. The firm has extensive international experience in all areas of intellectual property related matters (patent, trademark, trade secret and copyright) and intellectual property litigation specifically including patent litigation. The firm is primarily focused in the area of patent prosecution services including: patent application preparation, filing, searching, patentability opinions, and related patent services. The firm was founded by George V. Woodling and Bruce B. Krost with offices in the Union Commerce Building (now the Huntington Building) in Cleveland, Ohio. In addition to being a patent attorney, Woodling was a very successful businessman and author. Woodling was the author of two books: Inventions and their Protections and God Glorified Through Invention and Art. Bruce Krost was involved in a number of interesting cases including: Ropat Corp v. McGraw-Edison Co., 535 F.2d 378, 191 USPQ 556 (7th Cir. 1976) and In re Rubinfield, 123 USPQ 210 (CCPA 1959). The firm later moved to the National City East Sixth Building about 1986. The firm is presently located in its own building in Kirtland, Ohio.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

LegalSight

None
Last Update: 2025-11-30
Between 800 and 849

Our team includes veterans of the legal services industry, technology experts, and business operations professionals. We leverage our expertise to maximize opportunities for improved workflows and processes. We bring together our talent and technology to help clients achieve greater operational efficiency, reduce risks, and take advantage of innovative software solutions. Welcome to the world of legal operations.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 100
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Woodling, Krost and Rust
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/legalsightsolutions.jpeg
LegalSight
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Woodling, Krost and Rust
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
LegalSight
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Woodling, Krost and Rust in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for LegalSight in 2025.

Incident History — Woodling, Krost and Rust (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Woodling, Krost and Rust cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — LegalSight (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LegalSight cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Woodling, Krost and Rust
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/legalsightsolutions.jpeg
LegalSight
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

LegalSight company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Woodling, Krost and Rust company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, LegalSight company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Woodling, Krost and Rust company.

In the current year, LegalSight company and Woodling, Krost and Rust company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither LegalSight company nor Woodling, Krost and Rust company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither LegalSight company nor Woodling, Krost and Rust company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither LegalSight company nor Woodling, Krost and Rust company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Woodling, Krost and Rust company nor LegalSight company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Woodling, Krost and Rust nor LegalSight holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Woodling, Krost and Rust company nor LegalSight company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

LegalSight company employs more people globally than Woodling, Krost and Rust company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Woodling, Krost and Rust nor LegalSight holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Woodling, Krost and Rust nor LegalSight holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Woodling, Krost and Rust nor LegalSight holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Woodling, Krost and Rust nor LegalSight holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Woodling, Krost and Rust nor LegalSight holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Woodling, Krost and Rust nor LegalSight holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X