Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Wolters Kluwer Legal & Regulatory USWolters Kluwer Legal & Regulatory US
VS
GLGGLG
Wolters Kluwer Legal & Regulatory US

Wolters Kluwer Legal & Regulatory US

76 Ninth Ave 7th Floor, New York, 10011, US

Last Update: 10/03/2026

View Profile

Wolters Kluwer Legal & Regulatory U.S. is a leader in professional information, workflow, and software solutions for legal, corporate compliance, retirement benefits, and pension professionals. We help our customers make critical decisions daily by providing expert solu...

NAICS:519
NAICS Definition:Other Information Services
Employees:516
Subsidiaries:45
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
GLG

GLG

60 East 42nd Street, 3rd Floor, New York, NY, US, 10165

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://glginsights.com
733/1000Moderate

GLG is the world’s largest insight network. We connect decision makers to the right experts so they can act with the confidence that comes from true clarity and have what it takes to get ahead. Our network of experts is the world’s largest source of first-hand expertise...

NAICS:519
NAICS Definition:Other Information Services
Employees:12,148
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Wolters Kluwer Legal & Regulatory US

Wolters Kluwer Legal & Regulatory US

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
GLG

GLG

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Information Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Wolters Kluwer Legal & Regulatory US in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Information Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GLG in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Wolters Kluwer Legal & Regulatory US (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Wolters Kluwer Legal & Regulatory US cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - GLG (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GLG cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Wolters Kluwer Legal & Regulatory US

Wolters Kluwer Legal & Regulatory US

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
GLG

GLG

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
GLG128072625

FAQ

Between Wolters Kluwer Legal & Regulatory US company and GLG company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Wolters Kluwer Legal & Regulatory US company and GLG company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Wolters Kluwer Legal & Regulatory US company and GLG company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Wolters Kluwer Legal & Regulatory US company and GLG company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Wolters Kluwer Legal & Regulatory US company and GLG company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Wolters Kluwer Legal & Regulatory US company and GLG company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Wolters Kluwer Legal & Regulatory US company and GLG company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Wolters Kluwer Legal & Regulatory US company and GLG company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Wolters Kluwer Legal & Regulatory US company and GLG company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Wolters Kluwer Legal & Regulatory US company and GLG company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Wolters Kluwer Legal & Regulatory US company and GLG company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Wolters Kluwer Legal & Regulatory US and GLG, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Wolters Kluwer Legal & Regulatory US and GLG, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Wolters Kluwer Legal & Regulatory US or GLG ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Wolters Kluwer Legal & Regulatory US or GLG ?
Between Wolters Kluwer Legal & Regulatory US and GLG, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Wolters Kluwer Legal & Regulatory US and GLG, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2