Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

The Imaging CenterThe Imaging Center
VS
SevitaSevita
The Imaging Center

The Imaging Center

7600 Wolf River Blvd, Germantown, 38138, US

Last Update: 02/12/2025

View Profile
767/1000Fair

The Imaging Center at Wolf River is a leader in diagnostic imaging, integrating state of art medical technology with a patient friendly environment. We offer easy scheduling, same and next day imaging services, easy convenient location and sub-specialty diagnostic inter...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:79
Subsidiaries:16
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Sevita

Sevita

6600 France Avenue South, Suite 350, Edina, Minnesota, US, 55435

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://sevitahealth.com/
778/1000Fair

Homes and communities are where people thrive. We’ve held this belief since our founding in 1967 and have worked to make it reality for the thousands of individuals we serve. We continue that work today and are using innovation, technology, and collaboration across our ...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:11,429
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
The Imaging Center

The Imaging Center

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Sevita

Sevita

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Imaging Center in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sevita in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - The Imaging Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Imaging Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Sevita (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sevita cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
The Imaging Center

The Imaging Center

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Sevita

Sevita

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between The Imaging Center company and Sevita company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between The Imaging Center company and Sevita company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between The Imaging Center company and Sevita company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between The Imaging Center company and Sevita company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between The Imaging Center company and Sevita company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between The Imaging Center company and Sevita company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between The Imaging Center company and Sevita company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between The Imaging Center company and Sevita company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between The Imaging Center company and Sevita company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between The Imaging Center company and Sevita company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between The Imaging Center company and Sevita company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between The Imaging Center and Sevita, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between The Imaging Center and Sevita, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - The Imaging Center or Sevita ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - The Imaging Center or Sevita ?
Between The Imaging Center and Sevita, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between The Imaging Center and Sevita, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67866
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Systerel S2OPC 1.7.3 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the LockedStaMac_ProcessMsg_DeleteMonitoredItemsResponse and SOPC_StaMac_NewDeleteMonitoredItems in the client wrapper DeleteMonitoredItems path

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67863
SUMMARY

In open62541 1.5.5, a server-side use-after-free exists in the local MonitoredItem callback path. The issue occurs when UA_Subscription_localPublish continues to use the current UA_Notification after a callback invokes UA_Server_deleteMonitoredItem for the current local MonitoredItem. This allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19026
SUMMARY

H5Z__filter_nbit in H5Znbit.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 dereferences cd_values[0] through cd_values[4] without validating that cd_values is non-NULL or that cd_nelmts is at least 5, the fixed size of the filter's header. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted HDF5 file that stores the N-Bit filter pipeline message with zero client-data values, opened and read via H5Dread, e.g. by the h5ls or h5repack tools.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-19025
SUMMARY

H5O__layout_decode in H5Olayout.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 does not validate that a chunked dataset's stored chunk-layout dimensionality matches its dataspace rank when an existing dataset is opened, whereas this check is performed only at dataset-creation time. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero and application crash in H5S__hyper_iter_get_seq_list in src/H5Shyper.c) via a crafted HDF5 file with mismatched chunk/dataspace ranks that is opened and read via H5Dopen2 and H5Dread, e.g. by the h5repack tool.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA