Woflow A.I CyberSecurity Scoring
Woflow
Company Information
Website:https://www.woflow.com/
Employees number:612
Number of followers:14,442
NAICS:5112
Industry Type:Software Development
Homepage:woflow.com
Woflow Risk Score (AI oriented)
Between 650 and 699
WoflowSoftware Development
Updated:
05/03/2026
05/03/2026
693/1000
Weak
B
Woflow Global Score (TPRM)
xxxx
WoflowSoftware Development
Score locked

WoflowWeak
Current Score
693B (WEAK)
01000
1 incidents
-62 avg impact
Incident timeline with MITRE ATT&CK tactics, techniques, and mitigations.
AUGUST 2026
700
JULY 2026
698
JUNE 2026
698
MAY 2026
696
APRIL 2026
696
MARCH 2026
755
Breach
05 Mar 2026 • Woflow
DoorDash, Walmart, Woflow and Uber: ShinyHunters Claims Woflow Breach: What It Means for SaaS Supply Chain Security
ShinyHunters Allegedly Breaches Woflow, Highlighting Growing SaaS Supply Chain Risks
693
CRITICAL-62
WOFAUBWALDOO1772749980
ShinyHunters Allegedly Breaches Woflow, Highlighting Growing SaaS Supply Chain Risks
The threat group ShinyHunters (tracked as UNC6040) has claimed responsibility for breaching Woflow, a third-party SaaS provider with reported customers including Uber, DoorDash, and Walmart. The attackers allege they exfiltrated hundreds of millions of records, though no public data sample has been released as of March 14, 2026, and Woflow has not issued a public response.
This incident underscores a broader shift in SaaS attacks, where threat actors increasingly target integration-heavy vendors to gain downstream access to multiple enterprises. Rather than breaching organizations individually, attackers exploit OAuth tokens, API connections, and non-human identities to move laterally across interconnected SaaS ecosystems. Similar tactics were observed in previous breaches, such as the Salesloft/Drift and Salesforce attacks, reflecting a structural evolution in SaaS-focused cybercrime.
ShinyHunters has refined a financially motivated playbook, leveraging trusted third-party integrations to compromise data at scale before publicly naming victims. In extortion-driven campaigns, attackers often provide proof of compromise directly to victims before releasing data, with delays potentially indicating ongoing negotiations. The group has previously set deadlines for data leaks, mirroring its 2025 Salesforce breach tactics claiming the breach, issuing ultimatums, and releasing data in waves to pressure targets.
The attack surface for SaaS supply chain threats has expanded due to widespread reliance on OAuth permissions, API tokens, and service accounts. These integrations often operate with elevated privileges, creating persistent vulnerabilities. Over-permissioned OAuth scopes, long-lived tokens, and inherited permissions from privileged users further exacerbate risks, as traditional security controls like MFA and SSE solutions fail to address application-layer threats.
A key challenge is the visibility gap in SaaS security. Many organizations assume sanctioned applications are secure after initial compliance audits, but dynamic SaaS environments where configurations, integrations, and permissions frequently change require continuous monitoring. Research indicates that 89% of compromised organizations believed they had adequate visibility at the time of an incident, highlighting the limitations of periodic audits.
Integration-rich vendors are prime targets because a single compromise can provide access to multiple downstream enterprises. These vendors often aggregate sensitive data, maintain API access across tenants, and operate standardized integration models, making them efficient vectors for large-scale attacks. ShinyHunters has claimed over 1.5 billion records across hundreds of companies in past campaigns, demonstrating the financial incentive behind this approach.
To mitigate such risks, security strategies must prioritize continuous SaaS posture management, strict governance of third-party OAuth permissions, and least-privilege enforcement for non-human identities. Short token lifetimes, rapid revocation mechanisms, and behavioral monitoring for anomalous activity are critical to detecting and preventing API-level breaches. As SaaS ecosystems grow more complex, organizations must shift from static compliance checks to operational, identity-centric security practices to address evolving supply chain threats.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
MOTIVATION
IMPACT
DATA BREACH
REFERENCES
FEBRUARY 2026
755
JANUARY 2026
755
DECEMBER 2025
755
NOVEMBER 2025
755
OCTOBER 2025
755
SEPTEMBER 2025
755
Frequently Asked Questions
?
What is the current A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score for Woflow ??
What was Woflow's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in July 2026 ??
What was Woflow's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in June 2026 ??
What was Woflow's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in May 2026 ??
What was Woflow's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in April 2026 ??
What was Woflow's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in March 2026 ??
What was Woflow's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in February 2026 ??
What was Woflow's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in January 2026 ??
What was Woflow's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in December 2025 ??
What was Woflow's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in November 2025 ??
What was Woflow's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in October 2025 ??
What was Woflow's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in September 2025 ??
What is the average per-incident point impact on Woflow's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score over the past 12 months ??
Where can I access detailed records of all cyber incidents associated with Woflow ??
Where can I find a summary of the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ??
Where can I view Woflow's profile page on Rankiteo ??
How accurate is the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?