Comparison Overview

WNS

VS

ZS

WNS

undefined, New York, undefined, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 800 and 849

WNS (Holdings) Limited (NYSE: WNS) is a global digital-led business transformation and services company. WNS combines deep industry knowledge with technology, analytics, and process expertise to co-create innovative, digitally-led transformational solutions with over 600+ clients across various industries. WNS delivers an entire spectrum of transformative solutions that entail industry-specific offerings, customer experience services, finance and accounting, human resources, procurement, and data-led analytics solutions to solve operational challenges and drive strategic growth journeys for businesses. As of September 30, 2024, WNS has 62,000+ professionals across 66 delivery centers worldwide, including facilities in the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, Turkey, Poland, Romania, China, Costa Rica, Malaysia, the Philippines, South Africa, Sri Lanka, and India.

NAICS: 5416
NAICS Definition: Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services
Employees: 56,347
Subsidiaries: 6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

ZS

1560 Sherman Avenue, Evanston, IL, US, 60201
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

ZS is a management consulting and technology firm that partners with companies to improve life and how we live it. We transform ideas into impact by bringing together data, science, technology and human ingenuity to deliver better outcomes for all. Founded in 1983, ZS has more than 13,000 employees in over 35 offices worldwide. To learn more, visit www.zs.com/ At ZS, our mission is to inspire each other to bring our unique perspective and experience to work each day. When you join our firm, you have access to a wealth of community groups to support you, energize you and inspire you to bring your authentic self to work each day.

NAICS: 5416
NAICS Definition: Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services
Employees: 18,004
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wns-global-services.jpeg
WNS
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/zs-associates.jpeg
ZS
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
WNS
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
ZS
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for WNS in 2025.

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ZS in 2025.

Incident History — WNS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

WNS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — ZS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ZS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wns-global-services.jpeg
WNS
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/zs-associates.jpeg
ZS
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

WNS company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to ZS company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, ZS company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to WNS company.

In the current year, ZS company and WNS company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither ZS company nor WNS company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither ZS company nor WNS company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither ZS company nor WNS company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither WNS company nor ZS company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither WNS nor ZS holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

WNS company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to ZS company.

WNS company employs more people globally than ZS company, reflecting its scale as a Business Consulting and Services.

Neither WNS nor ZS holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither WNS nor ZS holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither WNS nor ZS holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither WNS nor ZS holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither WNS nor ZS holds HIPAA certification.

Neither WNS nor ZS holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N