Comparison Overview

WNS

VS

Jacobs

WNS

undefined, New York, undefined, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-12-09
View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.wns.com

WNS (Holdings) Limited (NYSE: WNS) is a global digital-led business transformation and services company. WNS combines deep industry knowledge with technology, analytics, and process expertise to co-create innovative, digitally-led transformational solutions with over 600+ clients across various industries. WNS delivers an entire spectrum of transformative solutions that entail industry-specific offerings, customer experience services, finance and accounting, human resources, procurement, and data-led analytics solutions to solve operational challenges and drive strategic growth journeys for businesses. As of September 30, 2024, WNS has 62,000+ professionals across 66 delivery centers worldwide, including facilities in the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, Turkey, Poland, Romania, China, Costa Rica, Malaysia, the Philippines, South Africa, Sri Lanka, and India.

NAICS: 5416
NAICS Definition: Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services
Employees: 56,347
Subsidiaries: 6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Jacobs

1999 Bryan Street, Suite 1200, Dallas, TX, 75201, US
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799
http://www.jacobs.com

At Jacobs, we're challenging today to reinvent tomorrow – delivering outcomes and solutions for the world's most complex challenges. With a team of approximately 45,000, we provide end-to-end services in advanced manufacturing, cities & places, energy, environmental, life sciences, transportation and water. From advisory and consulting, feasibility, planning, design, program and lifecycle management, we're creating a more connected and sustainable world.

NAICS: 5416
NAICS Definition: Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services
Employees: 65,143
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wns-global-services.jpeg
WNS
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jacobs.jpeg
Jacobs
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
WNS
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Jacobs
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for WNS in 2025.

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Jacobs in 2025.

Incident History — WNS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

WNS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Jacobs (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Jacobs cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wns-global-services.jpeg
WNS
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jacobs.jpeg
Jacobs
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

WNS company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Jacobs company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Jacobs company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to WNS company.

In the current year, Jacobs company and WNS company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Jacobs company nor WNS company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Jacobs company nor WNS company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Jacobs company nor WNS company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither WNS company nor Jacobs company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither WNS nor Jacobs holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

WNS company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Jacobs company.

Jacobs company employs more people globally than WNS company, reflecting its scale as a Business Consulting and Services.

Neither WNS nor Jacobs holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither WNS nor Jacobs holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither WNS nor Jacobs holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither WNS nor Jacobs holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither WNS nor Jacobs holds HIPAA certification.

Neither WNS nor Jacobs holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References