Comparison Overview

WNS

VS

Guidehouse

WNS

undefined, New York, undefined, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-12-09
View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.wns.com

WNS (Holdings) Limited (NYSE: WNS) is a global digital-led business transformation and services company. WNS combines deep industry knowledge with technology, analytics, and process expertise to co-create innovative, digitally-led transformational solutions with over 600+ clients across various industries. WNS delivers an entire spectrum of transformative solutions that entail industry-specific offerings, customer experience services, finance and accounting, human resources, procurement, and data-led analytics solutions to solve operational challenges and drive strategic growth journeys for businesses. As of September 30, 2024, WNS has 62,000+ professionals across 66 delivery centers worldwide, including facilities in the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, Turkey, Poland, Romania, China, Costa Rica, Malaysia, the Philippines, South Africa, Sri Lanka, and India.

NAICS: 5416
NAICS Definition: Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services
Employees: 56,347
Subsidiaries: 6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Guidehouse

1676 International Dr, 800, McLean, Virginia, US, 22102
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799
https://www.guidehouse.com

Guidehouse is a global AI-led professional services firm delivering advisory, technology, and managed services to the commercial and government sectors. With an integrated business technology approach, Guidehouse drives efficiency and resilience in the healthcare, financial services, energy, infrastructure, and national security markets. Built to help clients across industries outwit complexity, the firm brings together approximately 18,000 professionals to achieve lasting impact and shape a meaningful future.

NAICS: 5416
NAICS Definition: Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services
Employees: 14,945
Subsidiaries: 7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wns-global-services.jpeg
WNS
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/guidehouse.jpeg
Guidehouse
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
WNS
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Guidehouse
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for WNS in 2025.

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Guidehouse in 2025.

Incident History — WNS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

WNS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Guidehouse (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Guidehouse cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wns-global-services.jpeg
WNS
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/guidehouse.jpeg
Guidehouse
Incidents

Date Detected: 1/2021
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog

FAQ

WNS company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Guidehouse company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Guidehouse company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas WNS company has not reported any.

In the current year, Guidehouse company and WNS company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Guidehouse company nor WNS company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Guidehouse company nor WNS company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Guidehouse company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while WNS company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither WNS company nor Guidehouse company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither WNS nor Guidehouse holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Guidehouse company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to WNS company.

WNS company employs more people globally than Guidehouse company, reflecting its scale as a Business Consulting and Services.

Neither WNS nor Guidehouse holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither WNS nor Guidehouse holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither WNS nor Guidehouse holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither WNS nor Guidehouse holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither WNS nor Guidehouse holds HIPAA certification.

Neither WNS nor Guidehouse holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References