Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

WizWiz
VS
Alvarez & MarsalAlvarez & Marsal
Wiz

Wiz

Embajadores, Madrid, 28012, ES

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
745/1000Moderate

"Wiz is a company powered by creativity and technology, fashioned in and for the knowledge economy" "We work openly and innovatively in Research, Development and Communications. It is Wiz mission to raise the bar in the areas of human development and competitive int...

NAICS:5416
NAICS Definition:Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services
Employees:34
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Alvarez & Marsal

Alvarez & Marsal

600 Madison Avenue, New York, 10022, US

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
782/1000Fair

Alvarez & Marsal is a leading global professional services firm dedicated to helping organizations tackle their most complex business issues, maximize stakeholder value, and deliver sustainable change. Privately held since its founding in 1983, clients select us for o...

NAICS:5416
NAICS Definition:Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services
Employees:13,906
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Wiz

Wiz

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Alvarez & Marsal

Alvarez & Marsal

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Avg (This Year)

Wiz has 23.08% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Alvarez & Marsal in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Wiz (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Wiz cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Alvarez & Marsal (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Alvarez & Marsal cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Wiz

Wiz

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
WIZ1768387058
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
AMAWIZ1768515615
Alvarez & Marsal

Alvarez & Marsal

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Wiz company and Alvarez & Marsal company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Wiz company and Alvarez & Marsal company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Wiz company and Alvarez & Marsal company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Wiz company and Alvarez & Marsal company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Wiz company and Alvarez & Marsal company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Wiz company and Alvarez & Marsal company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Wiz company and Alvarez & Marsal company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Wiz company and Alvarez & Marsal company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Wiz company and Alvarez & Marsal company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Wiz company and Alvarez & Marsal company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Wiz company and Alvarez & Marsal company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Wiz and Alvarez & Marsal, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Wiz and Alvarez & Marsal, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Wiz or Alvarez & Marsal ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Wiz or Alvarez & Marsal ?
Between Wiz and Alvarez & Marsal, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Wiz and Alvarez & Marsal, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA