Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

WITS, Inc.WITS, Inc.
VS
NVIDIANVIDIA
WITS, Inc.

WITS, Inc.

647 East Holly Avenue, St. Louis, 63147, US

Last Update: 19/03/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://witsinc.org
736/1000Moderate

WITS, Inc. is a local non-profit 501(c)3 organization that reuses and recycles unwanted electronics to enable education and artistic expression by providing technology access to those in need throughout the greater St. Louis area. WITS currently offers several communi...

NAICS:3341
NAICS Definition:Computer and Peripheral Equipment Manufacturing
Employees:53
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
NVIDIA

NVIDIA

2701 San Tomas Expressway, Santa Clara, CA, US, 95050

Last Update: 12/07/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.nvidia.com
793/1000Fair

Since its founding in 1993, NVIDIA (NASDAQ: NVDA) has been a pioneer in accelerated computing. The company’s invention of the GPU in 1999 sparked the growth of the PC gaming market, redefined computer graphics, ignited the era of modern AI and is fueling the creation of...

NAICS:3341
NAICS Definition:Computer and Peripheral Equipment Manufacturing
Employees:44,040
Subsidiaries:19
12-month incidents
7
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
4

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
WITS, Inc.

WITS, Inc.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
NVIDIA

NVIDIA

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer Hardware Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for WITS, Inc. in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Computer Hardware Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

NVIDIA has 566.67% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - WITS, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

WITS, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - NVIDIA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NVIDIA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
WITS, Inc.

WITS, Inc.

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
ORAWIT1773930753
NVIDIA

NVIDIA

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
NVI1781685010
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
SER1781072827
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
OKTMICATTNVI1780611852

FAQ

Between WITS, Inc. company and NVIDIA company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between WITS, Inc. company and NVIDIA company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between WITS, Inc. company and NVIDIA company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between WITS, Inc. company and NVIDIA company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between WITS, Inc. company and NVIDIA company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between WITS, Inc. company and NVIDIA company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between WITS, Inc. company and NVIDIA company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between WITS, Inc. company and NVIDIA company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between WITS, Inc. company and NVIDIA company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between WITS, Inc. company and NVIDIA company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between WITS, Inc. company and NVIDIA company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between WITS, Inc. and NVIDIA, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between WITS, Inc. and NVIDIA, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - WITS, Inc. or NVIDIA ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - WITS, Inc. or NVIDIA ?
Between WITS, Inc. and NVIDIA, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between WITS, Inc. and NVIDIA, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-57980
SUMMARY

Authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform tampering over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56741
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not apply an upper bound to terminal dimensions received via the Telnet NAWS option, and TelnetIO.handleNAWS() in TelnetIO.java:856-879 reads client-supplied width and height as 16-bit unsigned integers and passes values such as 65535x65535 to setTerminalGeometry(), allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to repeatedly alternate values and trigger continuous expensive rendering work that causes CPU exhaustion and denial of service. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56740
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not limit the number of environment variables a client may inject via the Telnet NEW-ENVIRON option, and TelnetIO.readNEVariables() in TelnetIO.java:1127-1180 stores each variable pair in a HashMap held by ConnectionData, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to flood unique variable pairs before the terminating IAC SE byte and exhaust JVM heap memory with an OutOfMemoryError. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56171
SUMMARY

Exposure of private personal information to an unauthorized actor in Windows RDP allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-54335
SUMMARY

Feathersjs is a framework for creating web APIs and real-time applications with TypeScript or JavaScript. In 5.0.44 and earlier, the _.merge(target, source) utility exported by @feathersjs/commons recursively merges source into target by iterating Object.keys(source). When source was produced by JSON.parse and contains a __proto__, constructor, or prototype key, that key is returned as an own-enumerable property; the recursive merge then resolves target['__proto__'] to Object.prototype and writes attacker-supplied properties onto it, polluting the prototype for all plain objects in the process for the lifetime of the Node process. This issue is fixed in version 5.0.45.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2