Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
WIRED

WIRED Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

wired.com

WIRED is where tomorrow is realized. The WIRED conversation illuminates how technology is changing every aspect of our lives--from culture to business, science to design. The breakthroughs and innovations that we cover lead to new ways of thinking, new connections, and new industries. We introduce you to the people, companies, and ideas that matter.


WIRED A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

WIRED
Company Information
Website:https://www.wired.com/
Employees number:526
Number of followers:1,741,803
NAICS:513
Industry Type:Technology, Information and Internet
Homepage:wired.com
WIRED Risk Score (AI oriented)
Between 650 and 699
logo
WIREDTechnology, Information and Internet
Updated:
01/04/2026
666/1000
Weak
B
AaaAaABaaBaBCaaCaC
Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
Insurance prefers TPRM score to calculate premium
WIRED Global Score (TPRM)
xxxx
logo
WIREDTechnology, Information and Internet
•••
Score locked
Instant access to detailed risk factors
Vulnerabilities
Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
Findings

WIRED
WIREDWeak
Current Score
666B (WEAK)
01000
3 incidents
-79 avg impact
Incident timeline with MITRE ATT&CK tactics, techniques, and mitigations.
JUNE 2026
672Before Incident
MAY 2026
669Before Incident
APRIL 2026
668Before Incident
MARCH 2026
666Before Incident
FEBRUARY 2026
664Before Incident
JANUARY 2026
661Before Incident
DECEMBER 2025
738Before Incident
Breach
20 Dec 2025WIRED
GQ, Condé Nast, Vogue, Wired, Self, Glamour, Vanity Fair, Teen Vogue and Condé Nast Traveler: Hacker Leaks 2.3M Wired.com Records, Claims 40M-User Condé Nast Breach

Wired.com User Data Leak by Hacker 'Lovely'

659After Incident
CRITICAL-79
GQ-CONCONWIRSELGLACONCONCON1766865597
Cybersecurity Alert: Hacker Leaks Data of 2.3 Million Wired.com Users, Claims Larger Condé Nast Breach On December 20, 2025, a hacker operating under the alias "Lovely" leaked what they claim is the personal data of over 2.3 million Wired.com users on the newly launched hacking forum Breach Stars. The leaked dataset includes full names, email addresses, user IDs, display names, account creation timestamps, and in some cases, last session dates—though no passwords or payment information were exposed. The data spans accounts created between 2011 and 2022, with some records showing recent activity, suggesting a breach of a live or archived user database. The hacker accused Condé Nast, Wired’s parent company, of neglecting security warnings, stating they had spent a month attempting to alert the company before resorting to the leak. In a provocative message, they threatened to release data from over 40 million additional accounts across Condé Nast’s portfolio in the coming weeks. The leaked breakdown includes records from brands such as GQ (994K), Vogue (1.9M), The New Yorker (6.8M), and Bon Appétit (2M), among others. An entry labeled "NIL" with 9.5 million accounts remains unidentified, while smaller segments suggest the breach may involve centralized account infrastructure. Prior to the leak, the hacker had contacted journalists, including DataBreaches.net, posing as a security researcher before shifting to threats of public exposure. The method of the breach remains undisclosed, though analysis by Hackread.com confirms the legitimacy of the leaked Wired data. Condé Nast has yet to issue a public statement confirming or denying the incident. Until an official response is provided, the claims and leaked data remain unverified.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Data Breach
MOTIVATION
Retaliation for ignored security warnings, potential financial gain (data sold on dark web)
IMPACT
Data Compromised: 2,366,576 Wired.com user records; over 40 million records across Condé Nast propertiesSystems Affected: Wired.com user database or shared Condé Nast identity platformBrand Reputation Impact: Potential damage to Condé Nast and Wired.com reputationLegal Liabilities: Potential regulatory violations (e.g., GDPR, CCPA)Identity Theft Risk: High (exposed PII like names and email addresses)Payment Information Risk: None (no payment data exposed)
DATA BREACH
Full namesEmail addressesUser IDsDisplay namesAccount creation/update timestampsLast session datesNumber Of Records Exposed: 2,366,576 (Wired.com); over 40 million (Condé Nast properties)Sensitivity Of Data: Moderate (PII exposed but no passwords or payment data)Data Exfiltration: Yes (leaked on hacking forum)Full namesEmail addressesUser IDs
NOVEMBER 2025
737Before Incident
OCTOBER 2025
736Before Incident
SEPTEMBER 2025
735Before Incident
AUGUST 2025
735Before Incident
JULY 2025
734Before Incident
SEPTEMBER 2024
728Before Incident
Vulnerability
01 Sep 2024WIRED
WIRED

Massive Data Collection During Democratic National Convention

722After Incident
HIGH-6
WIR001091024
During the Democratic National Convention, a WIRED investigation searched for cell site simulators, potentially used against protesters. No simulators were found, but massive data collection occurred, with signals from nearly 300,000 devices gathered, exposing vulnerabilities. Devices associated with law enforcement and consumer electronics painted a picture of location patterns and posed privacy concerns. The findings underscore the tracking risks inherent in a highly networked society, affecting both law enforcement and civilians during sensitive events.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Data Collection Incident
MOTIVATION
Surveillance and data collection
IMPACT
Location patternsDevice signals
DATA BREACH
Location patternsDevice signalsNumber Of Records Exposed: Nearly 300,000 devicesSensitivity Of Data: Medium
JUNE 2024
789Before Incident
Breach
16 Jun 2024WIRED
WIRED

Unauthorized Surveillance at 2024 Democratic National Convention

726After Incident
CRITICAL-63
WIR000011725
During the 2024 Democratic National Convention, a device was detected that raised concerns of potential unauthorized surveillance of convention attendees and protesters. Analysis by the EFF indicated that a cell-site simulator was likely used to intercept phone signals. This led to suspicions of privacy invasion and the collection of sensitive data, including call metadata and location information. The legitimacy of the deployment and adherence to warrant requirements remain unclear, casting a shadow on the privacy and security practices surrounding politically charged events.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Surveillance
MOTIVATION
Unauthorized surveillance
IMPACT
Call metadataLocation information
DATA BREACH
Call metadataLocation information

Frequently Asked Questions

?
What is the current A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score for WIRED ?
?
What was WIRED's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in May 2026 ?
?
What was WIRED's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in April 2026 ?
?
What was WIRED's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in March 2026 ?
?
What was WIRED's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in February 2026 ?
?
What was WIRED's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in January 2026 ?
?
What was WIRED's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in December 2025 ?
?
What was WIRED's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in November 2025 ?
?
What was WIRED's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in October 2025 ?
?
What was WIRED's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in September 2025 ?
?
What was WIRED's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in August 2025 ?
?
What was WIRED's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in July 2025 ?
?
What is the average per-incident point impact on WIRED's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score over the past 12 months ?
?
Where can I access detailed records of all cyber incidents associated with WIRED ?
?
Where can I find a summary of the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?
?
Where can I view WIRED's profile page on Rankiteo ?
?
How accurate is the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?
WIRED Cyber Scoring History | Rankiteo