WIRED A.I CyberSecurity Scoring
WIRED
Company Information
Website:https://www.wired.com/
Employees number:526
Number of followers:1,741,803
NAICS:513
Industry Type:Technology, Information and Internet
Homepage:wired.com
WIRED Risk Score (AI oriented)
Between 650 and 699
WIREDTechnology, Information and Internet
Updated:
01/04/2026
01/04/2026
666/1000
Weak
B
WIRED Global Score (TPRM)
xxxx
WIREDTechnology, Information and Internet
Score locked

WIREDWeak
Current Score
666B (WEAK)
01000
3 incidents
-79 avg impact
Incident timeline with MITRE ATT&CK tactics, techniques, and mitigations.
JUNE 2026
672
MAY 2026
669
APRIL 2026
668
MARCH 2026
666
FEBRUARY 2026
664
JANUARY 2026
661
DECEMBER 2025
738
Breach
20 Dec 2025 • WIRED
GQ, Condé Nast, Vogue, Wired, Self, Glamour, Vanity Fair, Teen Vogue and Condé Nast Traveler: Hacker Leaks 2.3M Wired.com Records, Claims 40M-User Condé Nast Breach
Wired.com User Data Leak by Hacker 'Lovely'
659
CRITICAL-79
GQ-CONCONWIRSELGLACONCONCON1766865597
Cybersecurity Alert: Hacker Leaks Data of 2.3 Million Wired.com Users, Claims Larger Condé Nast Breach
On December 20, 2025, a hacker operating under the alias "Lovely" leaked what they claim is the personal data of over 2.3 million Wired.com users on the newly launched hacking forum Breach Stars. The leaked dataset includes full names, email addresses, user IDs, display names, account creation timestamps, and in some cases, last session dates—though no passwords or payment information were exposed. The data spans accounts created between 2011 and 2022, with some records showing recent activity, suggesting a breach of a live or archived user database.
The hacker accused Condé Nast, Wired’s parent company, of neglecting security warnings, stating they had spent a month attempting to alert the company before resorting to the leak. In a provocative message, they threatened to release data from over 40 million additional accounts across Condé Nast’s portfolio in the coming weeks. The leaked breakdown includes records from brands such as GQ (994K), Vogue (1.9M), The New Yorker (6.8M), and Bon Appétit (2M), among others. An entry labeled "NIL" with 9.5 million accounts remains unidentified, while smaller segments suggest the breach may involve centralized account infrastructure.
Prior to the leak, the hacker had contacted journalists, including DataBreaches.net, posing as a security researcher before shifting to threats of public exposure. The method of the breach remains undisclosed, though analysis by Hackread.com confirms the legitimacy of the leaked Wired data. Condé Nast has yet to issue a public statement confirming or denying the incident. Until an official response is provided, the claims and leaked data remain unverified.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
MOTIVATION
IMPACT
DATA BREACH
REFERENCES
NOVEMBER 2025
737
OCTOBER 2025
736
SEPTEMBER 2025
735
AUGUST 2025
735
JULY 2025
734
SEPTEMBER 2024
728
Vulnerability
01 Sep 2024 • WIRED
WIRED
Massive Data Collection During Democratic National Convention
722
HIGH-6
WIR001091024
During the Democratic National Convention, a WIRED investigation searched for cell site simulators, potentially used against protesters. No simulators were found, but massive data collection occurred, with signals from nearly 300,000 devices gathered, exposing vulnerabilities. Devices associated with law enforcement and consumer electronics painted a picture of location patterns and posed privacy concerns. The findings underscore the tracking risks inherent in a highly networked society, affecting both law enforcement and civilians during sensitive events.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
MOTIVATION
IMPACT
DATA BREACH
REFERENCES
JUNE 2024
789
Breach
16 Jun 2024 • WIRED
WIRED
Unauthorized Surveillance at 2024 Democratic National Convention
726
CRITICAL-63
WIR000011725
During the 2024 Democratic National Convention, a device was detected that raised concerns of potential unauthorized surveillance of convention attendees and protesters. Analysis by the EFF indicated that a cell-site simulator was likely used to intercept phone signals. This led to suspicions of privacy invasion and the collection of sensitive data, including call metadata and location information. The legitimacy of the deployment and adherence to warrant requirements remain unclear, casting a shadow on the privacy and security practices surrounding politically charged events.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
MOTIVATION
IMPACT
DATA BREACH
REFERENCES
Frequently Asked Questions
?
What is the current A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score for WIRED ??
What was WIRED's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in May 2026 ??
What was WIRED's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in April 2026 ??
What was WIRED's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in March 2026 ??
What was WIRED's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in February 2026 ??
What was WIRED's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in January 2026 ??
What was WIRED's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in December 2025 ??
What was WIRED's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in November 2025 ??
What was WIRED's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in October 2025 ??
What was WIRED's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in September 2025 ??
What was WIRED's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in August 2025 ??
What was WIRED's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in July 2025 ??
What is the average per-incident point impact on WIRED's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score over the past 12 months ??
Where can I access detailed records of all cyber incidents associated with WIRED ??
Where can I find a summary of the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ??
Where can I view WIRED's profile page on Rankiteo ??
How accurate is the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?