Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

GIB® (Winstone Wallboards Ltd)GIB® (Winstone Wallboards Ltd)
VS
Owens CorningOwens Corning
GIB® (Winstone Wallboards Ltd)

GIB® (Winstone Wallboards Ltd)

105 Leonard Road, Auckland, 1060, NZ

Last Update: 26/03/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.gib.co.nz
748/1000Moderate

Winstone Wallboards Ltd is New Zealand's largest manufacturer and marketer of gypsum plasterboard, drywall systems, associated products and services. The company has been operating since 1927 and manufactures plasterboard systems under the GIB® brand name. Winstone Wall...

NAICS:4233
NAICS Definition:Lumber and Other Construction Materials Merchant Wholesalers
Employees:203
Subsidiaries:25
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Owens Corning

Owens Corning

World Headquarters, Toledo, 43659, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.owenscorning.com
773/1000Fair

Owens Corning is a building products leader committed to building a sustainable future through material innovation. Our products provide durable, sustainable, energy-efficient solutions that leverage our unique capabilities and market-leading positions to help our custo...

NAICS:4233
NAICS Definition:Lumber and Other Construction Materials Merchant Wholesalers
Employees:11,229
Subsidiaries:8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
GIB® (Winstone Wallboards Ltd)

GIB® (Winstone Wallboards Ltd)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Owens Corning

Owens Corning

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Wholesale Building Materials Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GIB® (Winstone Wallboards Ltd) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Wholesale Building Materials Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Owens Corning in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - GIB® (Winstone Wallboards Ltd) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GIB® (Winstone Wallboards Ltd) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Owens Corning (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Owens Corning cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
GIB® (Winstone Wallboards Ltd)

GIB® (Winstone Wallboards Ltd)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Owens Corning

Owens Corning

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between GIB® (Winstone Wallboards Ltd) company and Owens Corning company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between GIB® (Winstone Wallboards Ltd) company and Owens Corning company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between GIB® (Winstone Wallboards Ltd) company and Owens Corning company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between GIB® (Winstone Wallboards Ltd) company and Owens Corning company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between GIB® (Winstone Wallboards Ltd) company and Owens Corning company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between GIB® (Winstone Wallboards Ltd) company and Owens Corning company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between GIB® (Winstone Wallboards Ltd) company and Owens Corning company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between GIB® (Winstone Wallboards Ltd) company and Owens Corning company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between GIB® (Winstone Wallboards Ltd) company and Owens Corning company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between GIB® (Winstone Wallboards Ltd) company and Owens Corning company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between GIB® (Winstone Wallboards Ltd) company and Owens Corning company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between GIB® (Winstone Wallboards Ltd) and Owens Corning, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between GIB® (Winstone Wallboards Ltd) and Owens Corning, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - GIB® (Winstone Wallboards Ltd) or Owens Corning ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - GIB® (Winstone Wallboards Ltd) or Owens Corning ?
Between GIB® (Winstone Wallboards Ltd) and Owens Corning, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between GIB® (Winstone Wallboards Ltd) and Owens Corning, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-63261
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). A low-privileged authenticated user can send a specially crafted request to a Kibana machine learning feature, causing the server to exhaust available memory and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63260
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). An authenticated attacker with low-privilege access can trigger a denial of service condition in Kibana by sending a specially crafted, oversized request payload. Processing this user-supplied input requires resource-intensive memory allocation that can exhaust the available heap memory in the Kibana process, causing it to crash and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63259
SUMMARY

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (CWE-639) in Kibana can lead to information disclosure via user-supplied identifiers that reference scheduled query result data from Kibana Spaces the requester is not authorized to access.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63145
SUMMARY

Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) in Kibana can lead to integrity compromise of Machine Learning audit and notification records via Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs (CAPEC-1). A vulnerability exists in Kibana's Machine Learning functionality where a Machine Learning management endpoint performs an insufficient authorization check. The endpoint validates only a coarse privilege level but does not verify that the requesting user has access to the specific Machine Learning job or notification resources provided in the request. As a result, a low-privileged user with Machine Learning access in any Kibana space can manipulate Machine Learning audit and notification records for arbitrary jobs—including jobs in other spaces or belonging to other users—by leveraging Kibana's internally elevated credentials to write to restricted Machine Learning system indices that the user cannot access directly.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63144
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Recursion (CWE-674) in Elasticsearch can lead to denial of service via a specially crafted search request submitted by a low-privileged authenticated user. A user with read-level index access can submit a request that triggers unbounded recursive processing within the Elasticsearch query evaluation component, causing a fatal error that terminates the affected node. In single-node deployments, this results in complete service outage; in multi-node clusters, it causes repeated node restarts and sustained availability degradation.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8