Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Moët Hennessy Wine EstatesMoët Hennessy Wine Estates
VS
Pernod RicardPernod Ricard
Moët Hennessy Wine Estates

Moët Hennessy Wine Estates

None, None, Worldwide, None, OO, None

Last Update: 05/04/2026

View Profile

Moët Hennessy Wine Estates is a collection of wine Estates around the world, each of which was born from the dreams of pioneering founder, who sought out great terroirs to create exceptional wines. The Estates are located in some of the most iconic wine regions today. ...

NAICS:3121
NAICS Definition:Beverage Manufacturing
Employees:38
Subsidiaries:20
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Pernod Ricard

Pernod Ricard

5 cour Paul Ricard, Paris, 75008, FR

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.pernod-ricard.com
813/1000Good

Pernod Ricard is a convivial, responsible and successful global wine and spirits group and the #1 premium spirits organisation in the world. The Group represents 240 premium brands available in more than 160 countries. We are 18,500 exceptionally talented people worldwi...

NAICS:3121
NAICS Definition:Beverage Manufacturing
Employees:19,364
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Moët Hennessy Wine Estates

Moët Hennessy Wine Estates

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Pernod Ricard

Pernod Ricard

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Beverage Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Moët Hennessy Wine Estates in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Beverage Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pernod Ricard in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Moët Hennessy Wine Estates (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Moët Hennessy Wine Estates cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Pernod Ricard (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pernod Ricard cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Moët Hennessy Wine Estates

Moët Hennessy Wine Estates

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Pernod Ricard

Pernod Ricard

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Moët Hennessy Wine Estates company and Pernod Ricard company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Moët Hennessy Wine Estates company and Pernod Ricard company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Moët Hennessy Wine Estates company and Pernod Ricard company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Moët Hennessy Wine Estates company and Pernod Ricard company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Moët Hennessy Wine Estates company and Pernod Ricard company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Moët Hennessy Wine Estates company and Pernod Ricard company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Moët Hennessy Wine Estates company and Pernod Ricard company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Moët Hennessy Wine Estates company and Pernod Ricard company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Moët Hennessy Wine Estates company and Pernod Ricard company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Moët Hennessy Wine Estates company and Pernod Ricard company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Moët Hennessy Wine Estates company and Pernod Ricard company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Moët Hennessy Wine Estates and Pernod Ricard, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Moët Hennessy Wine Estates and Pernod Ricard, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Moët Hennessy Wine Estates or Pernod Ricard ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Moët Hennessy Wine Estates or Pernod Ricard ?
Between Moët Hennessy Wine Estates and Pernod Ricard, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Moët Hennessy Wine Estates and Pernod Ricard, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-56785
SUMMARY

FlatPress versions prior to commit 10be83c, contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in comment and contact forms where name, URL, and email fields are rendered without proper output encoding in Smarty templates. Attackers can inject arbitrary HTML and JavaScript through these fields to execute malicious scripts in browsers of viewers including administrators, or bypass URL scheme validation to inject javascript: or data: URIs.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-54588
SUMMARY

Poweradmin is a web-based DNS administration tool for PowerDNS server. Versions prior to 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 use the attacker-controlled `HTTP_HOST` request header as the authoritative source for building callback URLs in its OIDC, SAML, and logout authentication flows without any validation. An unauthenticated attacker can poison the `redirect_uri` sent to the Identity Provider, causing the IdP to redirect the victim's authorization code to an attacker-controlled server - resulting in full account takeover with no credentials required. Versions 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 patch the issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-48493
SUMMARY

Snipe-IT is an IT asset/license management system. In versions prior to 8.6.0, a user with only users.edit can send a PATCH to /api/v1/users/{their_own_id} and grant themselves any permission except admin and superuser — for example `assets.view`, `assets.create`, `reports.view`, import, etc. The issue is patched in version 8.6.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.2
CVE-2026-47693
SUMMARY

Poweradmin is a web-based DNS administration tool for PowerDNS server. Versions prior to 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 are vulnerable to CSV Injection (Formula Injection) in its log export functionality. User-controlled data — specifically the username field — is written to exported CSV files without sanitizing formula trigger characters (=, +, -, @). When an administrator exports activity logs and opens the resulting CSV in a spreadsheet application (Microsoft Excel, LibreOffice Calc, Google Sheets), any formula stored in a username is executed by the application. This can be used for phishing attacks against administrators or data exfiltration. Versions 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 patch the issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.7
CVE-2026-12164
SUMMARY

Fortra File Integrity Monitoring (FIM), formerly Tripwire Enterprise, versions prior to 9.4.0 may assign incorrect or elevated effective permissions to users created by the tetool import command while FIM is running, particularly when the import also creates or changes roles or role-permission relationships.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
0.8