Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

wind trewind tre
VS
VodafoneVodafone
wind tre

wind tre

Via Monte Rosa 91, MILANO, 20149, IT

Last Update: 20/07/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
https://www.windtregroup.it
685/1000Weak

WINDTRE è l’operatore italiano che offre connessioni, energia e prodotti assicurativi*. Un punto di riferimento per le famiglie che chiedono affidabilità, convenienza e trasparenza nelle offerte e che possono usufruire di consulenza e supporto capillare grazie alle cent...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:7,160
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2
Vodafone

Vodafone

1 Kingdom Street, London, W2 6BY, GB

Last Update: 08/09/2026

View Profile
Between 0 and 549
http://www.vodafone.com/
528/1000Critical

At Vodafone, our purpose is to connect everyone. From the seabed to the stars, we provide innovative mobile and fixed connectivity solutions to empower our customers across the globe. And we're constantly expanding coverage to bridge continents and spread inclusion, eve...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:156,565
Subsidiaries:18
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
7
Attack type number
4

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
wind tre

wind tre

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Vodafone

Vodafone

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

wind tre has 45.05% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

Vodafone has 98.02% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - wind tre (X = Date, Y = Severity)

wind tre cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Vodafone (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Vodafone cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
wind tre

wind tre

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
CHE1784787889
🔒 Incident : Breach
WIN1784558266
Vodafone

Vodafone

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
MICVODSAF1787473590
🔒 Incident : Breach
HCLTAT1786448292
🔒 Incident : Breach
VOD93129723

FAQ

Between wind tre company and Vodafone company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between wind tre company and Vodafone company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between wind tre company and Vodafone company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between wind tre company and Vodafone company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between wind tre company and Vodafone company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between wind tre company and Vodafone company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between wind tre company and Vodafone company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between wind tre company and Vodafone company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between wind tre company and Vodafone company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between wind tre company and Vodafone company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between wind tre company and Vodafone company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between wind tre and Vodafone, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between wind tre and Vodafone, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - wind tre or Vodafone ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - wind tre or Vodafone ?
Between wind tre and Vodafone, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between wind tre and Vodafone, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-84411
SUMMARY

The web management service in affected RouterOS versions contains an integer underflow in its HTTP request body handling that is reachable before authentication. This can be leveraged by an unauthenticated network attacker to achieve arbitrary code execution as root, or to cause a denial of service, using a single crafted request.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-02
UPDATED
Date2026-10-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-105051
SUMMARY

Denuvo Anti-Tamper through 2026-03-04 allows bypass of a hypervisor presence check via CPUID interception (SimpleSvm.sys on AMD; hyperkd.sys and hyperhv.dll on Intel).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-02
UPDATED
Date2026-10-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 1.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 1.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
0.5
CVE-2026-105050
SUMMARY

PeaZip before 11.3.0, in a non-default configuration, is vulnerable to OS command injection via a filename in an archive because "quotation character already used in the string" is mishandled.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-02
UPDATED
Date2026-10-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-105049
SUMMARY

Zilliz Attu before 3.0.0 has a Playground feature that does not require authentication for proxying arbitrary HTTP and HTTPS requests to URLs on the public internet.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-02
UPDATED
Date2026-10-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-105048
SUMMARY

The Playground feature of Zilliz Attu before 3.0.0 allows SSRF (proxying of requests to private IP addresses).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-02
UPDATED
Date2026-10-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.0
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2