Comparison Overview

Wind Magazine

VS

Social Life Magazine

Wind Magazine

None
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

Quentin R. Howard founded Wind in 1971 in Pikeville, Kentucky. His goal was to produce an eclectic, high-quality magazine while giving newcomers and emerging writers a chance at publication. For twenty-two years Quentin edited and published the growing magazine from his modest home on an eastern Kentucky hillside overlooking the valley's railroad and coal tipple. During that time Wind became one of the nation's longest-lived, the longest-lived in Kentucky, and among the most respected literary journals. Quentin proudly stated, "Readers of Wind include professors, factory workers, and housewives."Throughout the years the work of talented newcomers has appeared in the pages of wind alongside the work of some of the nation's best-known writers.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Social Life Magazine

New York, New York, 10018, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21

Social Life Magazine is the leading luxury publication for the Hamptons. Our content - which covers the luxury lifestyle on the local, national, and international levels — targets the captive audience of high-net worth and high-income individuals that summer on the East End of Long Island. Printed on top quality paper stock with seamless binding, the composition of the magazine itself mirrors the affluent market in which it is distributed — from Westhampton to Montauk. Luxury readers turn to Social Life to peruse the most exclusive event photos in society, read in-depth interviews with celebrities, real estate, bridal, and review sophisticated fashion editorial. By providing our readership with unparalleled content, we have established ourselves as the "must read"​ magazine for Hamptons and Manhattan tastemakers.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 29
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wind-magazine.jpeg
Wind Magazine
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Wind Magazine
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Social Life Magazine
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Wind Magazine in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Social Life Magazine in 2025.

Incident History — Wind Magazine (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Wind Magazine cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Social Life Magazine (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Social Life Magazine cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wind-magazine.jpeg
Wind Magazine
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/social-life-magazine.jpeg
Social Life Magazine
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Wind Magazine company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Social Life Magazine company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Social Life Magazine company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Wind Magazine company.

In the current year, Social Life Magazine company and Wind Magazine company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Social Life Magazine company nor Wind Magazine company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Social Life Magazine company nor Wind Magazine company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Social Life Magazine company nor Wind Magazine company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Wind Magazine company nor Social Life Magazine company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Wind Magazine nor Social Life Magazine holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Wind Magazine company nor Social Life Magazine company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Social Life Magazine company employs more people globally than Wind Magazine company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Wind Magazine nor Social Life Magazine holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Wind Magazine nor Social Life Magazine holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Wind Magazine nor Social Life Magazine holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Wind Magazine nor Social Life Magazine holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Wind Magazine nor Social Life Magazine holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Wind Magazine nor Social Life Magazine holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.