Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

win.rar GmbHwin.rar GmbH
VS
[24]7.ai[24]7.ai
win.rar GmbH

win.rar GmbH

win.rar GmbH, Berlin, 10117, DE

Last Update: 02/07/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.win-rar.com
739/1000Moderate

win.rar GmbH has been the official distributor of WinRAR and RARLAB products since February 2002 and handles all support, marketing and sales related to WinRAR & rarlab.com. win.rar GmbH is registered in Germany and is represented worldwide by local partners in more tha...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:9
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
[24]7.ai

[24]7.ai

2105 S Bascom Ave, Campbell, 95008, US

Last Update: 23/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.247.ai/
778/1000Fair

[24]7.ai™ customer engagement solutions use conversational artificial intelligence to understand customer intent, enabling companies to create personalized, predictive, and effortless customer experiences across all channels; attract and retain customers; boost agent pr...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:11,282
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
win.rar GmbH

win.rar GmbH

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
[24]7.ai

[24]7.ai

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

win.rar GmbH has 4.76% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for [24]7.ai in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - win.rar GmbH (X = Date, Y = Severity)

win.rar GmbH cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - [24]7.ai (X = Date, Y = Severity)

[24]7.ai cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
win.rar GmbH

win.rar GmbH

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
WIN1782980631
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
WIN748081525
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
WIN536081025
[24]7.ai

[24]7.ai

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between win.rar GmbH company and [24]7.ai company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between win.rar GmbH company and [24]7.ai company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between win.rar GmbH company and [24]7.ai company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between win.rar GmbH company and [24]7.ai company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between win.rar GmbH company and [24]7.ai company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between win.rar GmbH company and [24]7.ai company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between win.rar GmbH company and [24]7.ai company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between win.rar GmbH company and [24]7.ai company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between win.rar GmbH company and [24]7.ai company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between win.rar GmbH company and [24]7.ai company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between win.rar GmbH company and [24]7.ai company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between win.rar GmbH and [24]7.ai, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between win.rar GmbH and [24]7.ai, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - win.rar GmbH or [24]7.ai ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - win.rar GmbH or [24]7.ai ?
Between win.rar GmbH and [24]7.ai, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between win.rar GmbH and [24]7.ai, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-93892
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-93891
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3
CVE-2026-92832
SUMMARY

IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.5
CVE-2026-85457
SUMMARY

IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-84418
SUMMARY

IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2