Comparison Overview
Wilson Combat

Wilson Combat
None, None, Berryville, Arkansas, US, 72616
Last Update: 26/03/2026
Since 1977 Wilson Combat® has been the leading innovator in high-performance, custom 1911 handguns, tactical long guns, and accessories. A Wilson Combat® product’s unmatched level of exceptional reliability and peerless craftsmanship is only equaled by our legendary cus...

Decathlon
Villeneuve-d'Ascq, LILLE, FR, 59650
Last Update: 24/07/2026
We are Decathlon. We are sport. And we believe that sport brings out the best in people, especially those in teams. Our teammates are as passionate about people as they are about sport. Our values guide our daily actions: Vitality, Generosity, Responsibility, and Au...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Wilson Combat







Decathlon






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Sporting Goods Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Wilson Combat in 2026.
Incidents vs Sporting Goods Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
Decathlon has 2.91% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Wilson Combat (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Wilson Combat cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Decathlon (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Decathlon cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Wilson Combat

Decathlon
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
An issue in the SBN UDP interface of NASA cFS v7.0.1 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via transmitting a crafted SBN frame.
A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the cmd_edl function of OreSat Firmware v1.0. The vulnerability is triggered when processing the edl fw_flash command, where the <filename> argument is copied to a 64-byte stack buffer via memcpy without proper length validation. An attacker with physical access to the UART3 serial interface can exploit this vulnerability by sending a maliciously crafted command with an oversized filename parameter,
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Violation of Secure Design Principles vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized read access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to gain elevated privileges. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.