Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

William P. Clements Jr. University HospitalWilliam P. Clements Jr. University Hospital
VS
EsSaludEsSalud
William P. Clements Jr. University Hospital

William P. Clements Jr. University Hospital

N/A

Last Update: 13/01/2026

View Profile

UT Southwestern’s William P. Clements Jr. University Hospital opened its doors in December 2014, transforming the opportunities for medical care in North Texas.

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:2
Subsidiaries:13
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
EsSalud

EsSalud

120 Jirón Domingo Cueto, Jesús María, 15072, PE

Last Update: 31/03/2026

View Profile
783/1000Fair

El Seguro Social de Salud, EsSalud, es un organismo público descentralizado, con personería jurídica de derecho público interno, adscrito al Sector Trabajo y Promoción Social. Tiene por finalidad dar cobertura a los asegurados y sus derechohabientes, a través del otorg...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:16,309
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
William P. Clements Jr. University Hospital

William P. Clements Jr. University Hospital

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
EsSalud

EsSalud

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for William P. Clements Jr. University Hospital in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for EsSalud in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - William P. Clements Jr. University Hospital (X = Date, Y = Severity)

William P. Clements Jr. University Hospital cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - EsSalud (X = Date, Y = Severity)

EsSalud cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
William P. Clements Jr. University Hospital

William P. Clements Jr. University Hospital

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
EsSalud

EsSalud

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between William P. Clements Jr. University Hospital company and EsSalud company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between William P. Clements Jr. University Hospital company and EsSalud company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between William P. Clements Jr. University Hospital company and EsSalud company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between William P. Clements Jr. University Hospital company and EsSalud company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between William P. Clements Jr. University Hospital company and EsSalud company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between William P. Clements Jr. University Hospital company and EsSalud company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between William P. Clements Jr. University Hospital company and EsSalud company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between William P. Clements Jr. University Hospital company and EsSalud company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between William P. Clements Jr. University Hospital company and EsSalud company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between William P. Clements Jr. University Hospital company and EsSalud company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between William P. Clements Jr. University Hospital company and EsSalud company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between William P. Clements Jr. University Hospital and EsSalud, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between William P. Clements Jr. University Hospital and EsSalud, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - William P. Clements Jr. University Hospital or EsSalud ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - William P. Clements Jr. University Hospital or EsSalud ?
Between William P. Clements Jr. University Hospital and EsSalud, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between William P. Clements Jr. University Hospital and EsSalud, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1