Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

WhirlpoolWhirlpool
VS
Colgate-PalmoliveColgate-Palmolive
Whirlpool

Whirlpool

553 Benson Rd, Benton Harbor, 49022, US

Last Update: 18/02/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.whirlpool.com
778/1000Fair

At Whirlpool, we believe the simple acts of cooking, cleaning and washing have the power to make our world a better place. It starts at home, and as that care ripples outward to our schools, communities and cities, it shows the value in ways that are bigger than us all....

NAICS:30
NAICS Definition:Manufacturing
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:11
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Colgate-Palmolive

Colgate-Palmolive

300 Park Ave, New York, New York, US, 10022

Last Update: 29/03/2026

View Profile
825/1000Good

Make More Smiles. We are Colgate-Palmolive, a caring, innovative growth company that is reimagining a healthier future for all people, their pets and our planet. For over 200 years, we've poured our care into creating a future where everyone has more reasons to smile. C...

NAICS:30
NAICS Definition:Manufacturing
Employees:30,125
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Whirlpool

Whirlpool

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Colgate-Palmolive

Colgate-Palmolive

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Whirlpool in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Colgate-Palmolive in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Whirlpool (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Whirlpool cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Colgate-Palmolive (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Colgate-Palmolive cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Whirlpool

Whirlpool

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Colgate-Palmolive

Colgate-Palmolive

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Whirlpool company and Colgate-Palmolive company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Whirlpool company and Colgate-Palmolive company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Whirlpool company and Colgate-Palmolive company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Whirlpool company and Colgate-Palmolive company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Whirlpool company and Colgate-Palmolive company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Whirlpool company and Colgate-Palmolive company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Whirlpool company and Colgate-Palmolive company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Whirlpool company and Colgate-Palmolive company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Whirlpool company and Colgate-Palmolive company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Whirlpool company and Colgate-Palmolive company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Whirlpool company and Colgate-Palmolive company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Whirlpool and Colgate-Palmolive, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Whirlpool and Colgate-Palmolive, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Whirlpool or Colgate-Palmolive ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Whirlpool or Colgate-Palmolive ?
Between Whirlpool and Colgate-Palmolive, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Whirlpool and Colgate-Palmolive, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1