Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Whirlpool CorporationWhirlpool Corporation
VS
Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd.Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd.
Whirlpool Corporation

Whirlpool Corporation

2000 North M63, Benton Harbor, Michigan, US, 49022

Last Update: 13/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.whirlpoolcorp.com
791/1000Fair

Life at home has been at the heart of our business for 110+ years - it is why we exist and why we are passionate about what we do. Beginning with our founders to the everyday actions of our people, our values have always kept us grounded -- Integrity, Respect, Inclusion...

NAICS:30
NAICS Definition:Manufacturing
Employees:45,454
Subsidiaries:11
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd.

Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd.

Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd., Mumbai, 400079, IN

Last Update: 14/09/2026

View Profile
788/1000Fair

Godrej is one of India’s most trusted brands serving over 1.1bn customers worldwide, every day. Godrej & Boyce, a Godrej group company, began it's journey in 1897 with the manufacture of high quality locks and continues with its outstanding engineering capabilities ac...

NAICS:30
NAICS Definition:Manufacturing
Employees:19,182
Subsidiaries:5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Whirlpool Corporation

Whirlpool Corporation

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd.

Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Whirlpool Corporation in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd. in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Whirlpool Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Whirlpool Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Whirlpool Corporation

Whirlpool Corporation

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
WHI204219222
Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd.

Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Whirlpool Corporation company and Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd. company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Whirlpool Corporation company and Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Whirlpool Corporation company and Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Whirlpool Corporation company and Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd. company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Whirlpool Corporation company and Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd. company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Whirlpool Corporation company and Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd. company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Whirlpool Corporation company and Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd. company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Whirlpool Corporation company and Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd. company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Whirlpool Corporation company and Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd. company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Whirlpool Corporation company and Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd. company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Whirlpool Corporation company and Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd. company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Whirlpool Corporation and Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Whirlpool Corporation and Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Whirlpool Corporation or Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd. ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Whirlpool Corporation or Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd. ?
Between Whirlpool Corporation and Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd., which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Whirlpool Corporation and Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd., which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-89096
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in nfs-utils. An unauthenticated remote attacker can trigger a Denial of Service (DoS) by sending repeated state notification requests to an exposed rpc.statd service. The service fails to properly release memory allocated during callback processing, leading to continuous memory growth. Sustained requests can exhaust system resources, eventually causing the service to degrade or crash.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-89088
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow exists in libparted's file system resizing logic when handling FAT16 volumes. By convincing a user or administrator to resize a specially crafted FAT16 file system image with malformed directory metadata, an attacker can trigger an oversized read into a fixed-size memory buffer. This issue causes memory corruption, resulting in an application crash and a denial of service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-89085
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow can occur when processing a specially crafted FAT32 filesystem due to an integer calculation error during buffer allocation. A local attacker could exploit this by enticing a user or automated service to open a malicious filesystem image, resulting in an application crash leading to a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential memory corruption.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-17591
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libarchive. An attacker can cause a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential information disclosure due to a use-after-free vulnerability, which occurs when a program reads memory that has already been released. This issue arises when the archive_entry_copy_mac_metadata() function deallocates an internal buffer before completing a data copy. An attacker who can supply input to an application utilizing this function can trigger the flaw to crash the application or read uninitialized memory data.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.6
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1
CVE-2026-111802
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Nautilus. When a removable drive or disk image is unmounted or ejected, Nautilus prompts the user to empty the trash without verifying whether the trash directory paths are symbolic links. An attacker can exploit this flaw by tricking a user into mounting a crafted storage volume and confirming the prompt to empty the trash, leading to the arbitrary deletion of files accessible to that user.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.3