Comparison Overview

Whirlpool Corporation

VS

BSH Home Appliances Group

Whirlpool Corporation

2000 North M63, Benton Harbor, 49022, US
Last Update: 2025-12-25
Between 750 and 799

Life at home has been at the heart of our business for 110+ years - it is why we exist and why we are passionate about what we do. Beginning with our founders to the everyday actions of our people, our values have always kept us grounded -- Integrity, Respect, Inclusion & Diversity, One Whirlpool, Spirit of Winning. What we do at Whirlpool Corporation matters because consumers trust our brands. We never take that for granted and we work every day to earn that trust as we are committed to being the best kitchen and laundry company, in constant pursuit of improving life at home. ABOUT WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION Whirlpool Corporation (NYSE: WHR) is a leading home appliance company, in constant pursuit of improving life at home. As the only major U.S.-based manufacturer of kitchen and laundry appliances, the company is driving meaningful innovation to meet the evolving needs of consumers through its iconic brand portfolio, including Whirlpool, KitchenAid, JennAir, Maytag, Amana, Brastemp, Consul, and InSinkErator. In 2024, the company reported approximately $17 billion in annual sales - close to 90% of which were in the Americas - 44,000 employees, and 40 manufacturing and technology research centers. Additional information about the company can be found at WhirlpoolCorp.com.

NAICS: 30
NAICS Definition: Manufacturing
Employees: 45,326
Subsidiaries: 11
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

BSH Home Appliances Group

Carl-Wery-Str. 34, Munich, 81739, DE
Last Update: 2025-12-25
Between 750 and 799

BSH Hausgeräte GmbH is one of the world’s leading home appliance manufacturers [1]. Our brand portfolio includes global appliance brands like Bosch, Siemens and Gaggenau, as well as the regional brands Neff and Thermador, each offering unique solutions tailored to meet the needs of our consumers. [1] BSH is a Trademark Licensee of Robert Bosch GmbH and Siemens AG for the brands Bosch and Siemens. Founded in 1967, BSH was established as a joint venture between Robert Bosch GmbH (Stuttgart) and Siemens AG (Munich). BSH has been under the sole ownership of Bosch Group since January 2015. In its over 50 years of history, BSH has grown from a German exporter into one of the world's leading home appliance manufacturers. Local BSH locations participate in global DEI programs to the extent compliant with local law. Data Protection Information: https://www.bsh-group.com/data-protection-information Our Netiquette: https://www.bsh-group.com/bsh-social-media-netiquette?fbclid=IwAR3W9AfRHl1c4UjRFSviX4YcR3J9EwtXXBoCB-XzXE7NZHfcUgnYYo9mgyU

NAICS: 30
NAICS Definition: Manufacturing
Employees: 21,068
Subsidiaries: 29
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/whirlpool-corporation.jpeg
Whirlpool Corporation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bsh-home-appliances-group.jpeg
BSH Home Appliances Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Whirlpool Corporation
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
BSH Home Appliances Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Whirlpool Corporation in 2025.

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BSH Home Appliances Group in 2025.

Incident History — Whirlpool Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Whirlpool Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — BSH Home Appliances Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BSH Home Appliances Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/whirlpool-corporation.jpeg
Whirlpool Corporation
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2020
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Unknown
Motivation: Financial Gain, Data Theft
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bsh-home-appliances-group.jpeg
BSH Home Appliances Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

BSH Home Appliances Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Whirlpool Corporation company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Whirlpool Corporation company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas BSH Home Appliances Group company has not reported any.

In the current year, BSH Home Appliances Group company and Whirlpool Corporation company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Whirlpool Corporation company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while BSH Home Appliances Group company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither BSH Home Appliances Group company nor Whirlpool Corporation company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither BSH Home Appliances Group company nor Whirlpool Corporation company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Whirlpool Corporation company nor BSH Home Appliances Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Whirlpool Corporation nor BSH Home Appliances Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

BSH Home Appliances Group company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Whirlpool Corporation company.

Whirlpool Corporation company employs more people globally than BSH Home Appliances Group company, reflecting its scale as a Manufacturing.

Neither Whirlpool Corporation nor BSH Home Appliances Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Whirlpool Corporation nor BSH Home Appliances Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Whirlpool Corporation nor BSH Home Appliances Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Whirlpool Corporation nor BSH Home Appliances Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Whirlpool Corporation nor BSH Home Appliances Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Whirlpool Corporation nor BSH Home Appliances Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper Input Validation vulnerability in qs (parse modules) allows HTTP DoS.This issue affects qs: < 6.14.1. SummaryThe arrayLimit option in qs does not enforce limits for bracket notation (a[]=1&a[]=2), allowing attackers to cause denial-of-service via memory exhaustion. Applications using arrayLimit for DoS protection are vulnerable. DetailsThe arrayLimit option only checks limits for indexed notation (a[0]=1&a[1]=2) but completely bypasses it for bracket notation (a[]=1&a[]=2). Vulnerable code (lib/parse.js:159-162): if (root === '[]' && options.parseArrays) { obj = utils.combine([], leaf); // No arrayLimit check } Working code (lib/parse.js:175): else if (index <= options.arrayLimit) { // Limit checked here obj = []; obj[index] = leaf; } The bracket notation handler at line 159 uses utils.combine([], leaf) without validating against options.arrayLimit, while indexed notation at line 175 checks index <= options.arrayLimit before creating arrays. PoCTest 1 - Basic bypass: npm install qs const qs = require('qs'); const result = qs.parse('a[]=1&a[]=2&a[]=3&a[]=4&a[]=5&a[]=6', { arrayLimit: 5 }); console.log(result.a.length); // Output: 6 (should be max 5) Test 2 - DoS demonstration: const qs = require('qs'); const attack = 'a[]=' + Array(10000).fill('x').join('&a[]='); const result = qs.parse(attack, { arrayLimit: 100 }); console.log(result.a.length); // Output: 10000 (should be max 100) Configuration: * arrayLimit: 5 (test 1) or arrayLimit: 100 (test 2) * Use bracket notation: a[]=value (not indexed a[0]=value) ImpactDenial of Service via memory exhaustion. Affects applications using qs.parse() with user-controlled input and arrayLimit for protection. Attack scenario: * Attacker sends HTTP request: GET /api/search?filters[]=x&filters[]=x&...&filters[]=x (100,000+ times) * Application parses with qs.parse(query, { arrayLimit: 100 }) * qs ignores limit, parses all 100,000 elements into array * Server memory exhausted → application crashes or becomes unresponsive * Service unavailable for all users Real-world impact: * Single malicious request can crash server * No authentication required * Easy to automate and scale * Affects any endpoint parsing query strings with bracket notation

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A weakness has been identified in code-projects Refugee Food Management System 1.0. This affects an unknown part of the file /home/editfood.php. This manipulation of the argument a/b/c/d causes sql injection. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A security flaw has been discovered in code-projects Refugee Food Management System 1.0. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file /home/editrefugee.php. The manipulation of the argument rfid results in sql injection. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Authentication Bypass Using an Alternate Path or Channel vulnerability in Mobile Builder Mobile builder allows Authentication Abuse.This issue affects Mobile builder: from n/a through 1.4.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in Hiroaki Miyashita Custom Field Template allows Stored XSS.This issue affects Custom Field Template: from n/a through 2.7.5.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L