Comparison Overview
Whipple & Company, an Alera Group Company

Whipple & Company, an Alera Group Company
6100 Glades Rd. , Boca Raton, FL, 33434, US
Last Update: 28/04/2026
Outside the box is where Whipple & Company begins. Our firm is founded upon a clear purpose: Balancing our clients’ risk while tailoring optimized benefit packages that strengthen the relationship between employer and employee. It takes the right aptitude, experience, a...

Aviva
80 Fenchurch Street, London, EC3M 4AE, , GB
Last Update: 04/09/2026
💛 We're a leading Insurance, Wealth & Retirement business. 📣 Follow for #LifeAtAviva. Aviva is nothing without our people. Living up to our purpose to be with you today for a better tomorrow applies to those we work with just as much as it does to our custom...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Whipple & Company, an Alera Group Company







Aviva






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Whipple & Company, an Alera Group Company in 2026.
Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Aviva in 2026.
Incident History - Whipple & Company, an Alera Group Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Whipple & Company, an Alera Group Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Aviva (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Aviva cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Whipple & Company, an Alera Group Company

Aviva
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Heym from 0.0.55 before 0.0.121 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows shared collaborators to overwrite a workflow's error_workflow_id because the field is missing from OWNER_ONLY_EXECUTION_FIELDS. Attackers can point the error workflow to their own workflow with an HTTP node, and when the parent workflow errors the owner's decrypted credentials are injected and exfiltrated.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a quadratic complexity denial of service vulnerability in the SMTP client reply parser in SMTPConnection._onData and isPartialResponse. A malicious SMTP server or on-path attacker can stream continuation lines without a completion line before authentication, blocking the Node.js event loop and exhausting memory.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a denial of service vulnerability in MessageParser.parseHeaders that allows users to exhaust CPU through quadratic header unfolding. Attackers can supply large recipient lists or long headers that fold into tens of thousands of continuation lines, blocking the Node.js event loop during DKIM signing.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 contains an improper input validation vulnerability in its address parser that fails to strip RFC 5322 comments inside angle-bracket addresses. Attackers can supply recipients like a display name with a parenthesized comment in the domain, so illegal characters reach envelope.to and RCPT TO, causing rejected delivery or parser interpretation conflicts that bypass domain allow-lists.
Nodemailer 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 has a regular expression denial of service in SMTPConnection._actionEHLO, whose four AUTH mechanism detection regexes contain overlapping whitespace sub-patterns that backtrack quadratically. A malicious or man-in-the-middle SMTP server can reply to EHLO with 250-AUTH, a long whitespace run and a non-matching token, blocking the Node.js event loop for tens of seconds to hours before authentication.