Comparison Overview
WhereTo, a Flight Centre company

WhereTo, a Flight Centre company
27 Maiden Ln, San Francisco, California, 94108, US
Last Update: 28/01/2026
*We're Hiring* WhereTo is a business travel startup from San Francisco that evolved into an agile development and design studio within the Flight Centre family. We build travel solutions used by some of the largest companies on the planet.

Synechron
11 Times Square, Suite 3301, New York, NY, US, 10036
Last Update: 03/04/2026
At Synechron, we believe in the power of digital to transform businesses for the better. Our global consulting firm combines creativity and innovative technology to deliver industry-leading digital solutions. Synechron’s progressive technologies and optimization strateg...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

WhereTo, a Flight Centre company







Synechron






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for WhereTo, a Flight Centre company in 2026.
Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Synechron in 2026.
Incident History - WhereTo, a Flight Centre company (X = Date, Y = Severity)
WhereTo, a Flight Centre company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Synechron (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Synechron cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

WhereTo, a Flight Centre company

Synechron
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Improper access control in Microsoft Edge for Android allows an unauthorized attacker to bypass a security feature over a network.
A security vulnerability has been detected in NousResearch hermes-agent up to 2026.4.30. Affected is the function GatewayStreamConsumer._filter_and_accumulate of the file gateway/stream_consumer.py of the component Streaming Reasoning Tag Filter. The manipulation leads to improper handling of case sensitivity. The attack may be initiated remotely. The attack's complexity is rated as high. The exploitability is told to be difficult. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The project decided to not implement a dedicated fix: "[T]he analysis and the fix are both sound. It just lands below the bar for the maintenance cost of a duplicated scrub path."
- https://gist.github.com/YLChen-007/2229e5505bcbb3e15a7ae8fba4c4be37
- https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/
- https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/issues/27288
- https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/28631#issuecomment-4622188016
- https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-14617
- https://vuldb.com/submit/844654
- https://vuldb.com/vuln/376134
- https://vuldb.com/vuln/376134/cti
Insufficient ui warning of dangerous operations in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.
Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.
Relative path traversal in Microsoft Edge for Android allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information locally.