Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Wheels UpWheels Up
VS
QantasQantas
Wheels Up

Wheels Up

601 W 26th St, New York, NY, US, 10001

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://www.wheelsup.com
692/1000Weak

No matter where you’re going, it matters how you get there. Safety-vetted and verified private jets on demand.

NAICS:481
NAICS Definition:Air Transportation
Employees:1,029
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Qantas

Qantas

10 Bourke Road, Mascot, 2020, AU

Last Update: 07/10/2026

View Profile
Between 0 and 549
https://www.qantas.com
100/1000Critical

We would like to acknowledge the Traditional Custodians of the local lands and waterways on which we live, work and fly. We pay our respects to Elders past and present.   Spirit is everything to us, and joining the Qantas team means bringing your spirit to ours. We have...

NAICS:481
NAICS Definition:Air Transportation
Employees:18,076
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
3
Known data breaches
9
Attack type number
3

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Wheels Up

Wheels Up

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Qantas

Qantas

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Wheels Up in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Avg (This Year)

Qantas has 194.12% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Wheels Up (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Wheels Up cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Qantas (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Qantas cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Wheels Up

Wheels Up

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
WHE1765383376
Qantas

Qantas

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
OPTMEDQAN1784773430
🔒 Incident : Breach
LATORIQANAUSMEDOPT1790224558
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
LOC1774283448

FAQ

Between Wheels Up company and Qantas company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Wheels Up company and Qantas company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Wheels Up company and Qantas company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Wheels Up company and Qantas company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Wheels Up company and Qantas company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Wheels Up company and Qantas company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Wheels Up company and Qantas company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Wheels Up company and Qantas company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Wheels Up company and Qantas company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Wheels Up company and Qantas company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Wheels Up company and Qantas company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Wheels Up and Qantas, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Wheels Up and Qantas, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Wheels Up or Qantas ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Wheels Up or Qantas ?
Between Wheels Up and Qantas, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Wheels Up and Qantas, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-89096
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in nfs-utils. An unauthenticated remote attacker can trigger a Denial of Service (DoS) by sending repeated state notification requests to an exposed rpc.statd service. The service fails to properly release memory allocated during callback processing, leading to continuous memory growth. Sustained requests can exhaust system resources, eventually causing the service to degrade or crash.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-89088
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow exists in libparted's file system resizing logic when handling FAT16 volumes. By convincing a user or administrator to resize a specially crafted FAT16 file system image with malformed directory metadata, an attacker can trigger an oversized read into a fixed-size memory buffer. This issue causes memory corruption, resulting in an application crash and a denial of service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-89085
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow can occur when processing a specially crafted FAT32 filesystem due to an integer calculation error during buffer allocation. A local attacker could exploit this by enticing a user or automated service to open a malicious filesystem image, resulting in an application crash leading to a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential memory corruption.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-17591
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libarchive. An attacker can cause a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential information disclosure due to a use-after-free vulnerability, which occurs when a program reads memory that has already been released. This issue arises when the archive_entry_copy_mac_metadata() function deallocates an internal buffer before completing a data copy. An attacker who can supply input to an application utilizing this function can trigger the flaw to crash the application or read uninitialized memory data.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.6
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1
CVE-2026-111802
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Nautilus. When a removable drive or disk image is unmounted or ejected, Nautilus prompts the user to empty the trash without verifying whether the trash directory paths are symbolic links. An attacker can exploit this flaw by tricking a user into mounting a crafted storage volume and confirming the prompt to empty the trash, leading to the arbitrary deletion of files accessible to that user.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.3