Comparison Overview
Westpac Private Bank

Westpac Private Bank
200 Barangaroo Ave, Sydney, 2000, AU
Last Update: 30/04/2026
At Westpac Private Bank, we’ve built relationships of confidence and trust with high net worth individuals and their families over generations. We are committed to providing outstanding personalised service and innovative global investment opportunities to our clients. ...

BNP Paribas
16 boulevard des Italiens, Paris, FR, 75009
Last Update: 28/03/2026
BNP Paribas is a leading bank in Europe with an international reach. It has a presence in 64 countries, with more than 178,000 employees, including more than 144,000 in Europe. BNP Paribas holds leading positions in its three major operating divisions: ⚆ Commercial, P...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Westpac Private Bank







BNP Paribas






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Westpac Private Bank in 2026.
Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for BNP Paribas in 2026.
Incident History - Westpac Private Bank (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Westpac Private Bank cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - BNP Paribas (X = Date, Y = Severity)
BNP Paribas cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Westpac Private Bank

BNP Paribas
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Improper access control in Microsoft Edge for Android allows an unauthorized attacker to bypass a security feature over a network.
A security vulnerability has been detected in NousResearch hermes-agent up to 2026.4.30. Affected is the function GatewayStreamConsumer._filter_and_accumulate of the file gateway/stream_consumer.py of the component Streaming Reasoning Tag Filter. The manipulation leads to improper handling of case sensitivity. The attack may be initiated remotely. The attack's complexity is rated as high. The exploitability is told to be difficult. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The project decided to not implement a dedicated fix: "[T]he analysis and the fix are both sound. It just lands below the bar for the maintenance cost of a duplicated scrub path."
- https://gist.github.com/YLChen-007/2229e5505bcbb3e15a7ae8fba4c4be37
- https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/
- https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/issues/27288
- https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/28631#issuecomment-4622188016
- https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-14617
- https://vuldb.com/submit/844654
- https://vuldb.com/vuln/376134
- https://vuldb.com/vuln/376134/cti
Insufficient ui warning of dangerous operations in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.
Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.
Relative path traversal in Microsoft Edge for Android allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information locally.