Comparison Overview
Western Security Bank

Western Security Bank
2401 Grand Avenue FL 4, Billings, Montana, 59101, US
Last Update: 01/03/2026
Western Security Bank is a full service, community focused organization serving those who live and work in Yellowstone County, Montana. With conveniently located branches from Laurel to Lockwood, we offer more locations than any other financial institution serving the B...

KKR
30 Hudson Yards , New York, New York, US, 10001
Last Update: 31/03/2026
KKR is a leading global investment firm that offers alternative asset management as well as capital markets and insurance solutions. KKR aims to generate attractive investment returns by following a patient and disciplined investment approach, employing world-class peop...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Western Security Bank







KKR






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Western Security Bank in 2026.
Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for KKR in 2026.
Incident History - Western Security Bank (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Western Security Bank cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - KKR (X = Date, Y = Severity)
KKR cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Western Security Bank

KKR
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.