Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Western Electrical Contractors Association, Inc.Western Electrical Contractors Association, Inc.
VS
Burns & McDonnellBurns & McDonnell
Western Electrical Contractors Association, Inc.

Western Electrical Contractors Association, Inc.

3695 Bleckely St., Rancho Cordova, 95655, US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.goweca.com
703/1000Moderate

WECA is the premier independent electrical and low voltage contractors association in the American West. We provide innovative training and apprenticeship programs, offer advanced learning technologies for online electrician training, and provide contractors with the cr...

NAICS:23
NAICS Definition:Construction
Employees:94
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Burns & McDonnell

Burns & McDonnell

9400 Ward Pkwy, Kansas City, 64114, US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.burnsmcd.com
783/1000Fair

At Burns & McDonnell, our engineers, construction professionals, architects, planners, technologists and scientists do more than plan, design and construct. With a mission unchanged since 1898 — make our clients successful — we partner with you on the toughest challenge...

NAICS:23
NAICS Definition:Construction
Employees:15,385
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Western Electrical Contractors Association, Inc.

Western Electrical Contractors Association, Inc.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Burns & McDonnell

Burns & McDonnell

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Western Electrical Contractors Association, Inc. in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Burns & McDonnell in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Western Electrical Contractors Association, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Western Electrical Contractors Association, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Burns & McDonnell (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Burns & McDonnell cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Western Electrical Contractors Association, Inc.

Western Electrical Contractors Association, Inc.

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
WES723072625
Burns & McDonnell

Burns & McDonnell

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Western Electrical Contractors Association, Inc. company and Burns & McDonnell company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Western Electrical Contractors Association, Inc. company and Burns & McDonnell company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Western Electrical Contractors Association, Inc. company and Burns & McDonnell company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Western Electrical Contractors Association, Inc. company and Burns & McDonnell company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Western Electrical Contractors Association, Inc. company and Burns & McDonnell company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Western Electrical Contractors Association, Inc. company and Burns & McDonnell company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Western Electrical Contractors Association, Inc. company and Burns & McDonnell company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Western Electrical Contractors Association, Inc. company and Burns & McDonnell company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Western Electrical Contractors Association, Inc. company and Burns & McDonnell company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Western Electrical Contractors Association, Inc. company and Burns & McDonnell company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Western Electrical Contractors Association, Inc. company and Burns & McDonnell company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Western Electrical Contractors Association, Inc. and Burns & McDonnell, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Western Electrical Contractors Association, Inc. and Burns & McDonnell, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Western Electrical Contractors Association, Inc. or Burns & McDonnell ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Western Electrical Contractors Association, Inc. or Burns & McDonnell ?
Between Western Electrical Contractors Association, Inc. and Burns & McDonnell, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Western Electrical Contractors Association, Inc. and Burns & McDonnell, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2