Comparison Overview
Wellpoint

Wellpoint
N/A
Last Update: 11/08/2026
Healthcare is more than coverage alone. It is being there when people need you most and helping in ways they never imagined. That’s why we provide whole-health solutions: to support people throughout their lives and communities in improving their health. Because everyon...

TATA AIG General Insurance Company Limited
15th floor , Tower A , Peninsula Business Park, Lower Parel, Mumbai , 400013, IN
Last Update: 01/04/2026
At TATA AIG General Insurance, we wear our achievements like a badge of honour – proudly and with gratitude! We have been recognized as one of India’s Top 100 Best Companies to Work For and among the Top 25 Best Workplaces in BFSI in 2024. As a joint venture between th...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Wellpoint







TATA AIG General Insurance Company Limited






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)
Wellpoint has 37.11% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for TATA AIG General Insurance Company Limited in 2026.
Incident History - Wellpoint (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Wellpoint cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - TATA AIG General Insurance Company Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)
TATA AIG General Insurance Company Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Wellpoint

TATA AIG General Insurance Company Limited
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A security flaw has been discovered in THU-MIG yoloe up to 40cd606cabdbe2b566d6f14a6b162c89206e9a1b. This affects the function eval of the file ultralytics/nn/autobackend.py of the component AutoBackend Model Loading. The manipulation of the argument imgsz/names/kpt_shape results in improper neutralization of directives in dynamically evaluated code. The attack requires a local approach. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. This product does not use versioning. This is why information about affected and unaffected releases are unavailable. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.
Coder before 2.34.7 contains an IP spoofing vulnerability in the ExtractRealIPAddress middleware that trusts the leftmost, client-supplied X-Forwarded-For value instead of the client IP appended by a reverse proxy. Attackers can send forged X-Forwarded-For values through appending proxies to bypass per-IP rate limits on login, one-time passcode, and password validation endpoints, enabling brute-force attacks, and to falsify IP addresses recorded in audit logs.
Coder before 2.29.17, 2.30.0 before 2.32.7, 2.33.0 before 2.33.8, and 2.34.0 before 2.34.2 contains a user enumeration vulnerability because userpassword.Compare() substitutes a placeholder hash derived from the string "hunter2" when a stored password hash is empty. Unauthenticated attackers can submit logins with the password "hunter2" and distinguish HTTP 403 from 401 responses to enumerate valid accounts and reveal the authentication provider of SSO-only users.
Coder before 2.29.17, 2.30.0 before 2.32.7, 2.33.0 before 2.33.8, and 2.34.0 before 2.34.2 contains a stored HTML injection vulnerability because the ApplicationName and LogoURL appearance settings are rendered into HTML output without sufficient escaping. Attackers with the Owner role can store HTML markup in these settings that renders in the Coder dashboard and in SMTP notification emails sent to other deployment users.
Coder from 2.0.0 before 2.34.8 contains an open redirect vulnerability in handleAPIKeySmuggling that allows attackers to redirect users externally via unsanitized r.URL.Path values. Attackers can craft links on trusted workspace app subdomains with paths beginning with double slashes, which become scheme-relative redirects to attacker sites for phishing.